atom feed19 messages in com.googlegroups.google-web-toolkitRe: Google does not use its own GWT f...
FromSent OnAttachments
David BalmeJul 30, 2008 9:12 am 
Ian BamburyJul 30, 2008 3:53 pm 
Ian BamburyJul 30, 2008 3:58 pm 
TimJul 30, 2008 6:21 pm 
David BalmeJul 30, 2008 7:30 pm 
PingJul 31, 2008 4:49 am 
rustyJul 31, 2008 5:06 pm 
Magno MachadoAug 1, 2008 10:43 am 
waldenAug 1, 2008 12:24 pm 
Magno MachadoAug 1, 2008 12:35 pm 
Ian BamburyAug 1, 2008 12:36 pm 
Magno MachadoAug 1, 2008 12:48 pm 
Magno MachadoAug 1, 2008 12:51 pm 
Srini MarreddyAug 1, 2008 1:10 pm 
Ian BamburyAug 1, 2008 1:11 pm 
MaximAug 1, 2008 2:30 pm 
David BalmeAug 2, 2008 1:13 pm 
Arthur KalmensonAug 4, 2008 8:02 pm 
bru...@google.comAug 13, 2008 3:04 pm 
Subject:Re: Google does not use its own GWT framework
From:bru...@google.com (bru@google.com)
Date:Aug 13, 2008 3:04:56 pm
List:com.googlegroups.google-web-toolkit

I'm late to the party, but I'd like to reiterate that an increasing number of Google apps are indeed using GWT, especially new ones. Apps teams that have been around longer find it harder to make the switch for all the pragmatic reasons discussed above.

To add a few to the list of examples: Google Talk for the iPhone, Google Checkout, Google Mashup Editor, and big ol' complex piece of AdWords administration that supports managing the regional aspects of your campaign. There are in fact, enough GWT apps in the works now that I can't really keep track of what's launched vs. not, so I'd better stop there :-)

-- Bruce

On Aug 4, 8:03 pm, Arthur Kalmenson <arth@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello David,

From the various new products that Google has released recently, most of them look to be GWT based (Google Base and Google Health). I'd assume that at one point or another, members of other teams will realize that they can't go on using Javascript (maintainability issues) and will eventually switch to GWT.

Regards, Arthur Kalmenson

On Aug 2, 4:13 pm, David Balme <davi@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Folks:

Thanks for proving me wrong about Google's own usage of GWT.

I agree that doing re-writes to prove the viability of a library is a bit much.  I stand corrected.

I still would like to see more effort on Google's part to have more of their *new* initiatives use the GWT framework.  It can only help the toolkit.

Cheers and thanks David

On Aug 1, 5:31 pm, Maxim <maxi@gmail.com> wrote:

3) As far as I can tell Google does not use GWT!!!! This is a problem of GWT credibility!

What aboutwww.google.com/health?

code:

<script language="javascript" src="../gwt/dashboard/ com.google.healthcare.weaver.frontend2.client.WeaverDashboard.nocache.js"><­/ script> <iframe id="__gwt_historyFrame"

looks pretty like it uses gwt :)

Maximhttp://projectkaiser.com:8080/pk

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Goog@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Google-Web-Toolkit+unsu@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---