atom feed42 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-javaRe: FreeBSD OS version for HotSpot (w...
FromSent OnAttachments
Greg LewisJul 8, 2002 8:12 am 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 3:10 am 
K.J....@kpn.comJul 10, 2002 3:16 am 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 3:28 am 
Massimo LusettiJul 10, 2002 3:40 am 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 3:44 am 
Marc RechtJul 10, 2002 3:44 am 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 4:04 am 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 5:20 am 
Georg-W. KoltermannJul 10, 2002 1:40 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 4:24 pm 
Nate WilliamsJul 10, 2002 4:29 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 4:43 pm 
Nate WilliamsJul 10, 2002 4:45 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 4:47 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 4:58 pm 
Michael GrattonJul 10, 2002 5:17 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 5:33 pm 
Michael GrattonJul 10, 2002 5:43 pm 
Nate WilliamsJul 10, 2002 8:30 pm 
Nate WilliamsJul 10, 2002 8:33 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 8:51 pm 
Nate WilliamsJul 10, 2002 8:57 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 9:45 pm 
Nate WilliamsJul 10, 2002 9:48 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 9:56 pm 
Nate WilliamsJul 10, 2002 9:58 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 10:11 pm 
Chris DohertyJul 10, 2002 11:36 pm 
Bill HueyJul 10, 2002 11:43 pm 
Marc RechtJul 11, 2002 4:07 am 
Bill HueyJul 11, 2002 4:17 am 
Marc RechtJul 11, 2002 5:08 am 
Bill HueyJul 11, 2002 7:21 am 
Bill HueyJul 11, 2002 7:53 am 
Marc RechtJul 11, 2002 8:04 am 
Bill HueyJul 11, 2002 8:09 am 
Marc van KempenJul 11, 2002 8:11 am 
Marc RechtJul 11, 2002 8:13 am 
Georg-W. KoltermannJul 12, 2002 3:02 am 
Marc van KempenJul 12, 2002 4:07 am 
Ernst de HaanJul 12, 2002 4:34 am 
Subject:Re: FreeBSD OS version for HotSpot (was: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready)
From:Bill Huey (bil@gnuppy.monkey.org)
Date:Jul 10, 2002 4:58:00 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-java

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:45:59PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:

I believe Dan is going to do this, but until that happens, why not just leave the -stable support in place? It certainly isn't hurting anything.

There's another subtle bug in -stable that isn't worth it for me to track it down, which just gives me more reason to abandon -stable since it won't run correctly on it anyways even with my hacks. It directly includes a private pthreads header...

I'd like to keep things clean by removing a lot of the sloppiness in the current tree. What I commited was a snapshot of my development tree and was in no way designed for general consumption and I don't expect folks to clean up after me.

If there's a compelling reason for me to keep -stable, then I'm open to suggestions such as large body of folks that can only run -stable because they have only 1 machine, etc...

bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message