| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Greg Lewis | Jul 8, 2002 8:12 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 3:10 am | |
| K.J....@kpn.com | Jul 10, 2002 3:16 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 3:28 am | |
| Massimo Lusetti | Jul 10, 2002 3:40 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 3:44 am | |
| Marc Recht | Jul 10, 2002 3:44 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 4:04 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 5:20 am | |
| Georg-W. Koltermann | Jul 10, 2002 1:40 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 4:24 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 10, 2002 4:29 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 4:43 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 10, 2002 4:45 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 4:47 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 4:58 pm | |
| Michael Gratton | Jul 10, 2002 5:17 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 5:33 pm | |
| Michael Gratton | Jul 10, 2002 5:43 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 10, 2002 8:30 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 10, 2002 8:33 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 8:51 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 10, 2002 8:57 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 9:45 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 10, 2002 9:48 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 9:56 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 10, 2002 9:58 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 10:11 pm | |
| Chris Doherty | Jul 10, 2002 11:36 pm | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 10, 2002 11:43 pm | |
| Marc Recht | Jul 11, 2002 4:07 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 11, 2002 4:17 am | |
| Marc Recht | Jul 11, 2002 5:08 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 11, 2002 7:21 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 11, 2002 7:53 am | |
| Marc Recht | Jul 11, 2002 8:04 am | |
| Bill Huey | Jul 11, 2002 8:09 am | |
| Marc van Kempen | Jul 11, 2002 8:11 am | |
| Marc Recht | Jul 11, 2002 8:13 am | |
| Georg-W. Koltermann | Jul 12, 2002 3:02 am | |
| Marc van Kempen | Jul 12, 2002 4:07 am | |
| Ernst de Haan | Jul 12, 2002 4:34 am |
| Subject: | Re: FreeBSD OS version for HotSpot (was: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Bill Huey (bil...@gnuppy.monkey.org) | |
| Date: | Jul 10, 2002 4:58:00 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-java | |
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:45:59PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
I believe Dan is going to do this, but until that happens, why not just leave the -stable support in place? It certainly isn't hurting anything.
There's another subtle bug in -stable that isn't worth it for me to track it down, which just gives me more reason to abandon -stable since it won't run correctly on it anyways even with my hacks. It directly includes a private pthreads header...
I'd like to keep things clean by removing a lot of the sloppiness in the current tree. What I commited was a snapshot of my development tree and was in no way designed for general consumption and I don't expect folks to clean up after me.
If there's a compelling reason for me to keep -stable, then I'm open to suggestions such as large body of folks that can only run -stable because they have only 1 machine, etc...
bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message





