Monica J. Martin wrote
mm1: Duane, this seems to reflect functionality that does not exist or
is planned later in some of the technical specification development. I
am interested where the requirements came from and where those
requirements are held/defined, given the changes you have made in the
model.
That is incorrect. It is forensic and is taken from the existing
approved specs (BP v 1.01, CPA v 2.0, MS v 2.0, CCTS v 2.01, UMM N090
R12, TA 1.04 and eb Requirements v 1.06). What components are you
referring to?
mm1: If you look at the work item list for ebBP v2.0 you will find
that we have resolved to make TTP an element with conditionality
likely attached.
Cool + 1
mm1: See comments (not flames in notes in the .pdf) for ease of
understanding comment to model.
C'mon - no flames??? I figured such work was at least good for 2-5
flames ;-)
I am not able to work on this right now but will resume when things are
less busy.
D
21 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoaRe: [ebxml-bp] eBusiness Metamodel EA...
.pdf