atom feed130 messages in edu.ku.nhm.mailman.taxacomRe: [Taxacom] validation of taxon names
FromSent OnAttachments
Armand TurpelFeb 14, 2012 12:41 am 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 14, 2012 1:01 pm 
Armand TurpelFeb 15, 2012 12:59 am 
Roderic PageFeb 15, 2012 1:50 am 
Paul KirkFeb 15, 2012 1:55 am 
greg whitbreadFeb 15, 2012 5:05 am 
Chris ThompsonFeb 15, 2012 8:03 am 
David PattersonFeb 15, 2012 8:07 am 
Roderic PageFeb 15, 2012 9:12 am 
Doug YanegaFeb 15, 2012 10:40 am 
Paul KirkFeb 15, 2012 10:51 am 
Roderic PageFeb 15, 2012 11:23 am 
Armand TurpelFeb 15, 2012 11:39 am 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 15, 2012 12:47 pm 
Jim CroftFeb 15, 2012 1:06 pm 
Curtis ClarkFeb 15, 2012 5:49 pm 
Tony...@csiro.auFeb 15, 2012 7:19 pm 
Roderic PageFeb 15, 2012 10:18 pm 
Jim CroftFeb 15, 2012 10:29 pm 
Armand TurpelFeb 16, 2012 5:12 am 
Roderic PageFeb 16, 2012 8:24 am 
Doug YanegaFeb 16, 2012 9:45 am 
Chuck MillerFeb 16, 2012 11:57 am 
Bradley BoyleFeb 16, 2012 2:45 pm 
Richard ZanderFeb 16, 2012 3:10 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 16, 2012 3:24 pm 
Frederick W. SchuelerFeb 16, 2012 3:31 pm 
Chuck MillerFeb 16, 2012 4:14 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 16, 2012 4:28 pm 
Chris ThompsonFeb 16, 2012 7:05 pm 
Kim van der LindeFeb 16, 2012 7:13 pm 
Neal EvenhuisFeb 16, 2012 7:27 pm 
Kim van der LindeFeb 16, 2012 7:38 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 16, 2012 7:40 pm 
muscapaulFeb 17, 2012 12:16 am 
Dr Brian TaylorFeb 17, 2012 12:23 am 
Armand TurpelFeb 17, 2012 1:25 am 
Chris ThompsonFeb 17, 2012 7:03 am 
Chris ThompsonFeb 17, 2012 11:23 am 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 17, 2012 1:09 pm 
Chris ThompsonFeb 17, 2012 2:04 pm 
Tony...@csiro.auFeb 17, 2012 2:32 pm 
Richard PyleFeb 17, 2012 2:51 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 17, 2012 3:16 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 17, 2012 3:18 pm 
Richard PyleFeb 17, 2012 3:22 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 17, 2012 3:37 pm 
Richard PyleFeb 17, 2012 5:06 pm 
Tony...@csiro.auFeb 17, 2012 5:18 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 17, 2012 5:27 pm 
Curtis ClarkFeb 17, 2012 7:39 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 17, 2012 8:04 pm 
Richard ZanderFeb 18, 2012 9:26 am 
Richard ZanderFeb 18, 2012 9:59 am 
Richard PyleFeb 18, 2012 11:33 am 
Curtis ClarkFeb 18, 2012 6:45 pm 
Richard PyleFeb 18, 2012 8:59 pm 
Paul van RijckevorselFeb 19, 2012 12:36 am 
Roderic PageFeb 19, 2012 5:48 am 
Paul van RijckevorselFeb 19, 2012 7:36 am 
Roderic PageFeb 19, 2012 8:09 am 
Paul van RijckevorselFeb 19, 2012 8:58 am 
Curtis ClarkFeb 19, 2012 8:59 am 
Curtis ClarkFeb 19, 2012 9:49 am 
Frederick W. SchuelerFeb 19, 2012 10:29 am 
Richard PyleFeb 19, 2012 12:14 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 12:45 pm 
Bob MesibovFeb 19, 2012 2:23 pm 
Walker, KenFeb 19, 2012 2:36 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 2:38 pm 
Bob MesibovFeb 19, 2012 2:54 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 2:56 pm 
Walker, KenFeb 19, 2012 3:08 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 4:05 pm 
Bob MesibovFeb 19, 2012 4:07 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 4:38 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 5:09 pm 
Curtis ClarkFeb 19, 2012 5:18 pm 
Bob MesibovFeb 19, 2012 5:33 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 5:50 pm 
Kenneth KinmanFeb 19, 2012 7:27 pm 
Weakley, AlanFeb 19, 2012 7:47 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 7:50 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 7:52 pm 
Curtis ClarkFeb 19, 2012 8:13 pm 
Stephen ThorpeFeb 19, 2012 8:22 pm 
Dr.B.J.TindallFeb 19, 2012 11:08 pm 
Paul van RijckevorselFeb 19, 2012 11:52 pm 
Paul van RijckevorselFeb 19, 2012 11:56 pm 
Richard PyleFeb 20, 2012 1:02 am 
Richard PyleFeb 20, 2012 1:24 am 
Richard PyleFeb 20, 2012 1:27 am 
Richard PyleFeb 20, 2012 1:32 am 
Paul van RijckevorselFeb 20, 2012 3:07 am 
Curtis ClarkFeb 20, 2012 7:28 am 
Paul van RijckevorselFeb 20, 2012 8:55 am 
Richard PyleFeb 20, 2012 9:07 am 
33 later messages
Subject:Re: [Taxacom] validation of taxon names
From:Stephen Thorpe (step@yahoo.co.nz)
Date:Feb 17, 2012 3:37:09 pm
List:edu.ku.nhm.mailman.taxacom

OK, but I think this poses a big problem for biodiversity informatics, that is,
if they want to provide something that is actually useful to general users
(including governments concerned with biosecurity and/or conservation issues,
which require data of a certain kind)   yes, a biodiversity database could index species under their original
combinations, e.g., Diarthrocera formicaephila Broun, 1893, and then simply list
alternative names in chronological order, which, in the present case would end
with: Diarthrocera formicaephila Broun, 1893 according to Maddison in
Macfarlane et al. (2010)   but who is going to be able to make any practical use out of such information???   Stephen

________________________________ From: Richard Pyle <deep@bishopmuseum.org> To: TAXA@MAILMAN.NHM.KU.EDU Sent: Saturday, 18 February 2012 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [Taxacom] validation of taxon names

Thanks, Stephen - I largely agree.

[...]

So, the question is, what is the currently valid name of Diarthrocera formicaephila Broun, 1893??

As I said (or, at least implied) in my previous post:  there is no such thing as "currently valid", without a context of "currently", and an "according to whom".

Aloha, Rich

This message is only intended for the addressee named above.  Its contents may
be privileged or otherwise protected.  Any unauthorized use, disclosure or
copying of this message or its contents is prohibited.  If you have received
this message by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply mail or by
collect telephone call.  Any personal opinions expressed in this message do not
necessarily represent the views of the Bishop Museum.

_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List Taxa@mailman.nhm.ku.edu http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom 
your search terms here

_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List Taxa@mailman.nhm.ku.edu http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom
your search terms here