Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Hello,
Is courier imap 3.0.8 giving anyone else
general difficulty as opposed to 1.7.x?
When I check my mail from KMail, with IMAP_USELOCKS=1,
I get STATUS errors, but with IMAP_USELOCKS=0, it
downloads a few headers and then says the connection
is broken. If I try to check just one folder (as opposed
to my entire mailbox) then it works fine, but that's
not as useful as checking the entire mailbox for new
mail...
OK. Looks like I've determined the cuase of the IMAP
problem. The following dir structure must have been
supported (or at least tolerated) in previous
courier-imap releases, but now it causes errors:
[11:39]jesse@chortos:[/usr/local/vpopmail/domains/wingnet.net/jesse/.maildir]#
ls -al .Personal.Mailing\ Lists.squirrelmail
total 192
drwx------ 3 vpopmail vpopmail 4096 Jun 2 2003 .
drwx------ 201 vpopmail vpopmail 12288 Sep 26 22:49 ..
-rw------- 1 vpopmail vpopmail 159747 Oct 4 2002 .squirrelmail-users.index
-rw-r--r-- 1 vpopmail vpopmail 1677 Oct 4 2002
.squirrelmail-users.index.ids
-rw-r--r-- 1 vpopmail vpopmail 15 Oct 5 2002 courierimapuiddb
-rw------- 1 vpopmail vpopmail 0 Jun 2 2003 maildirfolder
drwx------ 5 vpopmail vpopmail 4096 Oct 5 2002 squirrelmail
[12:09]jesse@chortos:[/usr/local/vpopmail/domains/wingnet.net/jesse/.maildir]#
ls -al .Personal.Mailing\ Lists.squirrelmail/squirrelmail/
total 20
drwx------ 5 vpopmail vpopmail 4096 Oct 5 2002 .
drwx------ 3 vpopmail vpopmail 4096 Jun 2 2003 ..
drwx------ 2 vpopmail vpopmail 4096 Oct 4 2002 cur
drwx------ 2 vpopmail vpopmail 4096 Oct 4 2002 new
drwx------ 2 vpopmail vpopmail 4096 Oct 4 2002 tmp
The fix is to do this:
[12:11]jesse@chortos:[/usr/local/vpopmail/domains/wingnet.net/jesse/.maildir]#
mv .Personal.Mailing\ Lists.squirrelmail/squirrelmail/* .Personal.Mailing\
Lists.squirrelmail
[12:12]jesse@chortos:[/usr/local/vpopmail/domains/wingnet.net/jesse/.maildir]#
rmdir .Personal.Mailing\ Lists.squirrelmail/squirrelmail
Does anyone have a script that will do this for me?
3 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: general courier i...
