atom feed34 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Standard Signatures
FromSent OnAttachments
Peter BurdenMar 18, 2008 5:01 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 18, 2008 8:17 am 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 8:48 am 
Ben KennedyMar 18, 2008 12:00 pm 
Aidas KasparasMar 18, 2008 12:13 pm 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 12:43 pm 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 12:56 pm 
Norbert SchmidtMar 18, 2008 1:22 pm 
Gordon MessmerMar 18, 2008 5:55 pm 
Jerry AmundsonMar 19, 2008 9:58 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 19, 2008 11:47 am 
Harry DuncanMar 20, 2008 12:02 am 
Aidas KasparasMar 20, 2008 2:19 am 
Peter BurdenMar 20, 2008 4:03 am 
EndaMar 20, 2008 4:44 am 
Harry DuncanMar 20, 2008 4:47 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 20, 2008 9:04 am 
Peter BurdenApr 22, 2008 8:56 am 
Peter BurdenApr 22, 2008 8:57 am 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 12:22 am 
Peter BurdenApr 23, 2008 2:14 am 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 3:20 pm 
Peter BurdenApr 23, 2008 4:48 pm 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 9:27 pm 
Peter BurdenMay 12, 2008 9:06 am 
Aleksander AdamowskiMay 15, 2008 10:53 am 
Peter BurdenMay 15, 2008 3:33 pm 
Aleksander AdamowskiMay 16, 2008 2:49 am 
Peter BurdenJun 18, 2008 9:00 am 
Jeff JansenJun 18, 2008 5:45 pm 
Peter BurdenJun 19, 2008 1:56 pm 
Gordon MessmerJun 19, 2008 4:35 pm 
Jeff JansenJun 19, 2008 6:08 pm.patch
Peter BurdenJul 22, 2008 3:47 am 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Standard Signatures
From:Peter Burden (pete@gmail.com)
Date:May 12, 2008 9:06:35 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

I've now done a revised version of the signing filter that fixes the bugs about signing attachments. Code, as before, at http://web.ptwol.net/sigfilter

Does anybody have any ideas/pointers on the degree to which real-world mail conforms or doesn't conform to the RFCs (esp 2822)? I've done checks using MS Outlook and Mozilla Thunderbird as clients but I'm sure there are some seriously buggy clients out there ;-(