| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 21, 2004 7:33 am | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Oct 21, 2004 7:41 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 21, 2004 7:46 am | |
| Richard Wendland | Oct 21, 2004 7:59 am | |
| Mike Silbersack | Oct 21, 2004 8:23 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 21, 2004 8:37 am | |
| Bruce M Simpson | Oct 21, 2004 8:40 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 21, 2004 9:23 am | |
| Garrett Wollman | Oct 21, 2004 9:27 am | |
| Mark Allman | Oct 21, 2004 10:31 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 21, 2004 10:56 am | |
| Matt Emmerton | Oct 21, 2004 11:31 am | |
| Sean Chittenden | Oct 21, 2004 11:31 am | |
| Mark Allman | Oct 21, 2004 11:32 am | |
| David O'Brien | Oct 21, 2004 11:51 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 21, 2004 11:56 am | |
| Julian Elischer | Oct 21, 2004 11:59 am | |
| Garrett Wollman | Oct 21, 2004 12:02 pm | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 21, 2004 12:02 pm | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 21, 2004 12:04 pm | |
| Sean Chittenden | Oct 21, 2004 12:24 pm | |
| Marco Molteni | Oct 21, 2004 12:34 pm | |
| Igor Sysoev | Oct 21, 2004 12:41 pm | |
| Craig Rodrigues | Oct 21, 2004 6:46 pm | |
| Russell L. Carter | Oct 21, 2004 7:02 pm | |
| Julian Elischer | Oct 21, 2004 8:24 pm | |
| SUZUKI Shinsuke | Oct 22, 2004 12:47 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smørgrav | Oct 22, 2004 5:06 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smørgrav | Oct 22, 2004 5:47 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 22, 2004 8:14 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 22, 2004 8:17 am | |
| Brian Fundakowski Feldman | Oct 22, 2004 8:44 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 22, 2004 8:55 am | |
| Mark Allman | Oct 22, 2004 11:24 am | |
| Peter Lei | Oct 22, 2004 5:59 pm | |
| Randall Stewart | Oct 23, 2004 6:07 am | |
| Randall Stewart | Oct 23, 2004 6:16 am | |
| Randall Stewart | Oct 23, 2004 6:17 am | |
| Randall Stewart | Oct 23, 2004 6:20 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Oct 23, 2004 7:16 am | |
| Randy Bush | Oct 23, 2004 9:01 am | |
| SUZUKI Shinsuke | Oct 25, 2004 10:18 pm | |
| Randall Stewart | Oct 26, 2004 3:41 am | |
| Peter Lei | Oct 26, 2004 7:44 am | |
| Karim Fodil-Lemelin | Nov 4, 2004 9:52 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Nov 4, 2004 10:50 am | |
| Julian Elischer | Nov 4, 2004 12:52 pm | |
| Matt Sealey | Nov 4, 2004 12:58 pm | |
| Karim Fodil-Lemelin | Nov 5, 2004 8:08 am | |
| Karim Fodil-Lemelin | Nov 5, 2004 8:39 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Nov 5, 2004 8:45 am | |
| Karim Fodil-Lemelin | Nov 5, 2004 9:12 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Nov 5, 2004 9:31 am | |
| Karim Fodil-Lemelin | Nov 5, 2004 1:45 pm | |
| Andre Oppermann | Nov 5, 2004 2:16 pm | |
| Mark Allman | Nov 8, 2004 8:08 pm | |
| Andre Oppermann | Jul 3, 2005 12:08 am | |
| Andre Oppermann | Jul 3, 2005 11:43 am | |
| Randall Stewart | Jul 3, 2005 11:44 am |
| Subject: | Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Karim Fodil-Lemelin (kf...@xiphos.ca) | |
| Date: | Nov 4, 2004 9:52:56 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-arch | |
Hi,
I am jumping in here, was too busy to read the list for the last 2 weeks, so please excuse my intrusion. We are using T/TCP in our product line and are very happy with the performance gain. Could you tell me what is the rational for removing T/TCP (security/performances/code complexity, etc ..) from FreeBSD?
Again, sorry for being a bit off topic here.
Mark Allman wrote:
A T/TCP alternative as you are describing sounds very similar to PR-SCTP (Partial Reliability SCTP). (Don't let the name fool you, please read the internet draft).
Can you sketch this in a bit more detail? I do not follow. PR-SCTP is about being allowed to "abandon" data --- i.e., send it and then decide that you don't really care if it gets across the network (say, because it got lost and has taken too long to retransmit and so the data is out of date). Without a Big Hack, I cannot envision TCP doing something like this. What am I missing?
Thanks, allman
-- Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/
-- Karim Fodil-Lemelin Lead Programmer
Xiphos Technologies Inc. www.xiplink.com





