11 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.xri-editorsRE: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as loc...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Wachob, Gabe | Nov 2, 2003 8:27 pm | |
| Drummond Reed | Nov 3, 2003 12:32 am | |
| Wachob, Gabe | Nov 3, 2003 9:01 am | |
| Drummond Reed | Nov 3, 2003 9:57 am | |
| Wachob, Gabe | Nov 3, 2003 10:04 am | |
| Veizades, John | Nov 3, 2003 10:04 am | |
| Wachob, Gabe | Nov 3, 2003 10:16 am | |
| Drummond Reed | Nov 3, 2003 2:58 pm | |
| Wachob, Gabe | Nov 3, 2003 3:02 pm | |
| Drummond Reed | Nov 3, 2003 3:15 pm | |
| Dave McAlpin | Nov 3, 2003 4:08 pm |
| Subject: | RE: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as local access protocol | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Drummond Reed (drum...@onename.com) | |
| Date: | Nov 3, 2003 12:32:44 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.xri-editors | |
I agree that defining a translation would be useful, but it's not actaully required, is it? Say I have an XRI for "@foo.bar" and then I want to make an LDAP query about a distinguished name at the endpoint identified by "@foo.bar". In that case I don't have to express that distinguished name as an XRI, I just need to know is that LDAP is a supported local access protocol at that endpoint, yes?
=Drummond
-----Original Message----- From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwac...@visa.com] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 8:32 PM To: Drummond Reed; XRI Editors (E-mail) Subject: RE: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as local access protocol
Well, thats OK, but there a bit of work to do. We have to define how a XRI gets translated into a LDAP or DSML query. This is not a straightforward process, and there are probably a multitude of ways to do it (an LDAP query is *structured* and I'm not sure how that structure is created).
Does someone have a proposal for how to do this in a flexible way?
-Gabe
-----Original Message----- From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drum...@onename.com] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 4:12 PM To: XRI Editors (E-mail) Subject: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as local access protocol
Gabe, I forgot that one of my notes in first reading the resolution section was why LDAP or DSML wasn't included as an option alongside X2R as a local access protocol? This is in relation to 3.2.2 an 3.4.
=Drummond
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri-editors/membe
rs/leave_workgroup.php.