| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Hays, Sam | Apr 9, 2001 6:32 am | |
| James Raftery | Apr 9, 2001 6:45 am | |
| Steve Tremblett | Apr 9, 2001 6:57 am | |
| Rasputin | Apr 9, 2001 7:47 am | |
| Matthew Emmerton | Apr 9, 2001 8:06 am | |
| Christopher Schulte | Apr 9, 2001 8:26 am | |
| Rasputin | Apr 9, 2001 8:28 am | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 9, 2001 8:45 am | |
| Christopher Schulte | Apr 9, 2001 9:23 am | |
| Jordan Hubbard | Apr 9, 2001 10:25 am | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 9, 2001 10:29 am | |
| Markus Holmberg | Apr 9, 2001 10:35 am | |
| Michael R. Rudel | Apr 9, 2001 10:37 am | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 9, 2001 10:38 am | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 9, 2001 10:49 am | |
| Jordan Hubbard | Apr 9, 2001 10:52 am | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 9, 2001 10:56 am | |
| David A. Koran | Apr 9, 2001 11:15 am | |
| Jordan Hubbard | Apr 9, 2001 11:15 am | |
| Przemyslaw Brojewski | Apr 9, 2001 11:15 am | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 9, 2001 11:31 am | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 9, 2001 11:36 am | |
| Przemyslaw Brojewski | Apr 9, 2001 11:58 am | |
| Rodney W. Grimes | Apr 9, 2001 12:10 pm | |
| Ken Bolingbroke | Apr 9, 2001 12:13 pm | |
| Kal Torak | Apr 9, 2001 12:34 pm | |
| Matthew Emmerton | Apr 9, 2001 12:54 pm | |
| Jeffrey J. Mountin | Apr 9, 2001 12:54 pm | |
| Scott Dodson | Apr 9, 2001 1:15 pm | |
| Jeff Love | Apr 9, 2001 1:28 pm | |
| David Kelly | Apr 9, 2001 1:42 pm | |
| Peter Radcliffe | Apr 9, 2001 1:43 pm | |
| Ben Loyall | Apr 9, 2001 2:07 pm | |
| James Penick | Apr 9, 2001 2:08 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Apr 9, 2001 2:20 pm | |
| Mike Meyer | Apr 9, 2001 3:54 pm | |
| Bob K | Apr 9, 2001 4:22 pm | |
| Conrad Sabatier | Apr 9, 2001 5:49 pm | |
| Christopher K Davis | Apr 9, 2001 5:54 pm | |
| Matthew Emmerton | Apr 9, 2001 7:03 pm | |
| Donn Miller | Apr 9, 2001 7:12 pm | |
| Jeffrey J. Mountin | Apr 9, 2001 10:53 pm | .Other |
| Nik Clayton | Apr 10, 2001 4:06 am | |
| Nik Clayton | Apr 10, 2001 4:12 am | |
| Nik Clayton | Apr 10, 2001 4:19 am | |
| Mike Meyer | Apr 10, 2001 5:51 am | |
| Steve Tremblett | Apr 10, 2001 6:36 am | |
| Graywane | Apr 10, 2001 6:53 am | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Apr 10, 2001 8:32 am | |
| Rodney W. Grimes | Apr 10, 2001 8:34 am | |
| Jordan Hubbard | Apr 10, 2001 8:41 am | |
| Gerhard Sittig | Apr 10, 2001 9:51 am | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 10, 2001 12:33 pm | |
| Rodney W. Grimes | Apr 10, 2001 1:52 pm | |
| Joe Abley | Apr 10, 2001 2:28 pm | |
| Mike Meyer | Apr 10, 2001 2:46 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Apr 10, 2001 2:47 pm | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 10, 2001 2:54 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Apr 10, 2001 2:54 pm | |
| Mike Meyer | Apr 10, 2001 2:55 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Apr 10, 2001 2:56 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Apr 10, 2001 3:28 pm | |
| Matthew Emmerton | Apr 10, 2001 5:28 pm | |
| Dima Dorfman | Apr 10, 2001 9:30 pm | |
| Peter Jeremy | Apr 10, 2001 10:30 pm | |
| Rodney W. Grimes | Apr 10, 2001 10:48 pm | |
| Steve O'Hara-Smith | Apr 10, 2001 11:00 pm | |
| Oliver Fromme | Apr 11, 2001 6:45 am | |
| David O'Brien | Apr 11, 2001 10:14 am | |
| jonathan michaels | Apr 11, 2001 12:26 pm | |
| Oliver Fromme | Apr 11, 2001 12:48 pm | |
| Pete French | Apr 11, 2001 12:58 pm | |
| Michael Butler | Apr 11, 2001 1:13 pm | |
| jonathan michaels | Apr 11, 2001 1:20 pm | |
| Nik Clayton | Apr 11, 2001 2:51 pm | |
| Dan Langille | Apr 11, 2001 3:19 pm | |
| Nik Clayton | Apr 12, 2001 12:57 am |
| Subject: | Re: Releases | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Dan Langille (da...@langille.org) | |
| Date: | Apr 9, 2001 10:29:21 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-stable | |
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Christopher Schulte wrote:
At 03:45 AM 4/10/2001 +1200, Dan Langille wrote:
Give meaningful and widely used names to things which people are familiar with.
-CURRENT fits all those requirements.
In this case, the familiarity is reduced to those familiar with the project. Witness the frequency with which the confusion arises.
I'm not as hot about the BETA designation, but generally feel it should be left alone simply because it's documented, and thus should NOT be a problem.
By this designation, we could call a brake a clutch and get away with it because it's all documented. The problem is not with the documentation. It's with the name.
Documentation is not the only factor. The name was chosen for a *reason*, to convey a point. It's choice was not arbitrary.
Is this from experience or are you guessing?
And it's since been accepted by the development and administrative community.
The people already on the project understand. They have been "indoctrinated" for lack of a better term. It's the new people which have the trouble. Perhaps with a better name that trouble could be easily avoided.
Question being: Now, are we to a point where that accepted name needs to be reevaluated for the sake of general consensus, need or desire. That's the real question, IMHO.
I think so.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message






.Other