24 messages in net.java.dev.jna.usersRe: [jna-users] Re: Mapping Struct to...
FromSent OnAttachments
thex...@email.comNov 1, 2008 1:46 am 
Timothy WallNov 1, 2008 5:04 am 
thex...@email.comNov 1, 2008 8:40 am 
Timothy WallNov 1, 2008 11:14 am 
Timothy WallNov 1, 2008 11:17 am 
thex...@email.comNov 2, 2008 12:30 am 
Timothy WallNov 2, 2008 7:42 am 
thex...@email.comNov 3, 2008 2:02 am 
Timothy WallNov 3, 2008 3:49 am 
thex...@email.comNov 3, 2008 4:51 am 
Timothy WallNov 3, 2008 6:22 am 
thex...@email.comNov 3, 2008 7:47 am 
Timothy WallNov 3, 2008 8:21 am 
thex...@email.comNov 3, 2008 11:19 pm 
Timothy WallNov 4, 2008 5:33 am 
Timothy WallNov 4, 2008 5:34 am 
thex...@email.comNov 4, 2008 2:33 pm 
Timothy WallNov 5, 2008 5:44 am 
thex...@email.comNov 5, 2008 8:15 am 
Timothy WallNov 5, 2008 9:19 am 
thex...@email.comNov 5, 2008 3:22 pm 
Timothy WallNov 5, 2008 7:00 pm 
thex...@email.comNov 6, 2008 3:36 am 
thex...@email.comNov 6, 2008 10:55 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [jna-users] Re: Mapping Struct to JavaActions...
From:Timothy Wall (twal@dev.java.net)
Date:Nov 4, 2008 5:34:47 am
List:net.java.dev.jna.users

On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:20 AM, thex@email.com wrote:

Any ideas? The dll can't be a C# dll, as fas as I know C# can't export functions. Any alignment or markings at the structure that need to be detected before coping the values returned to the structure?

One other thing. Try mapping an "int" return value on your test dll to see if you get the same results in that case as your real dll. If not, the dlls are not equivalent. If so, there's some overlooked difference in your Java code between the test and real cases.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user@jna.dev.java.net For additional commands, e-mail: user@jna.dev.java.net