| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Durand, Jacques R. | Aug 26, 2007 10:33 pm |
| Subject: | F2F tentative agenda | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Durand, Jacques R. (JDur...@us.fujitsu.com) | |
| Date: | Aug 26, 2007 10:33:26 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.tag | |
For review - let me know your suggestions. Patrick C. already reviewed (he will not be able to join due to unexpected personal matters and will stay in England with relatives)
-Jacques
Thursday: (9am - 5pm) =====
AM:
1. Administration (1h): - Review of the agenda and proposed updates. - review of current alternate meeting schedules. Voting status. - review wiki cooperation - K-TAG collaboration.
2. "homework" presentations: (1h45) - Patrick C. (Intro / rationale) (we can do this without Patrick, or have PC dial-in if possible) - Stephen (TA-UML) - Kevin (ADL assessment) What are issues raised, which place in the TAGuide doc?
PM:
3. Terminology and differentiation: (1h) - comparing and relating TA to other notions: spec requirement, test metadata, conf clause. - How to treat this in the TAGuide?
4. "homework" presentations (continuation): (1h15) - K-TAG (a list of comments/challenges) - Serm / Jacques (anatomy of a TA, examples)
5. A first pass thru pending Issues list to be discussed next day (see item #8):1h
Friday: (9am - 5pm) =====
AM:
6. Examples fest: (2h) - going thru a list of spec requirements samples, derive TAs. Draft TAGuide material? - going thru a list of TA samples, analyze them. Draft TAGuide material?
7. Administration: (45mn) - cooperation strategy with: (a) other groups in other SDO? (b) with other TCs , for "beta-testing" our TAGuide draft? - other
PM:
8. Get to a consensus on specific issues: (1h) - i1: case of spec material not qualified for TA. - i3: case of external spec references, implicit pre-requisites. - i5: the test environment: how much - i4: anatomy of a TA - categories of TAs vs a general structure with options.
9. A new pass on TAGuide, drafting content and structure: (2h) Goal: put together content draft and place holders for editors to fill-in, so that end of September we have a first complete draft. - draft overall structure of document, section titles / sizes. - editing choices: size, role/place of examples, terminology. - editors assignments.





