15 messages in net.java.dev.jna.usersRe: [jna-users] Override Pointer.fina...
FromSent OnAttachments
bb...@cox.netJun 26, 2007 9:11 am 
Timothy WallJun 26, 2007 12:52 pm 
Wayne MeissnerJun 26, 2007 7:43 pm 
Ben ChaseJun 26, 2007 8:39 pm 
Wayne MeissnerJun 26, 2007 10:33 pm 
Timothy WallJun 27, 2007 5:08 am 
Timothy WallJun 27, 2007 5:20 am 
Rick GoldsteinJun 27, 2007 8:50 am 
Timothy WallJun 27, 2007 9:59 am 
Ben ChaseJun 27, 2007 7:26 pm 
Timothy WallJun 28, 2007 3:56 am 
bb...@cox.netJun 28, 2007 4:43 am 
bb...@cox.netJun 28, 2007 5:37 am 
bb...@cox.netJun 28, 2007 6:18 am 
Wayne MeissnerJun 28, 2007 7:41 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [jna-users] Override Pointer.finalize to reclaim Native resources?Actions...
From:Timothy Wall (twal@dev.java.net)
Date:Jun 28, 2007 3:56:16 am
List:net.java.dev.jna.users

On Jun 27, 2007, at 10:27 PM, Ben Chase wrote:

On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Timothy Wall wrote:

The current state of member/class access is not written in stone, but mostly as restrictive as possible to communicate to the user which classes they really need to be looking at. We're trying to drive the API by actual usage, which unfortunately is limited right now to Wayne's gstreamer work and my various experiments with various w32 and X11 APIs.

Uhhhh, I'm actually using JNA, mostly starting within the past week. Mistake? Hope not. So far it looks good.

I don't mean to imply no one else is using it. I just mean that no one else has (yet) participated in a discussion of how best to represent usage XYZ, or provided much feedback after getting suggestions on how to approach a particular mapping.