atom feed23 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] GridFlow 9.9
FromSent OnAttachments
Mathieu BouchardMay 5, 2010 1:05 pm 
Pagano, PatrickMay 5, 2010 2:23 pm 
JackMay 14, 2010 8:06 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigMay 14, 2010 8:09 am 
JackMay 14, 2010 8:14 am 
Roman HaefeliMay 14, 2010 8:17 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 14, 2010 8:22 am 
JackMay 14, 2010 8:33 am 
MaxMay 15, 2010 5:28 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 15, 2010 10:53 am 
MaxMay 15, 2010 11:43 am 
Patrick BoivinMay 15, 2010 12:20 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 15, 2010 1:25 pm 
patkoMay 16, 2010 6:50 am 
ydeg...@gmail.comMay 16, 2010 7:36 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 16, 2010 8:25 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerMay 16, 2010 9:10 am 
Mathieu BouchardAug 4, 2010 3:36 pm 
Jonathan WilkesAug 4, 2010 4:21 pm 
Mathieu BouchardAug 4, 2010 5:25 pm 
Mathieu BouchardAug 4, 2010 5:29 pm 
Mathieu BouchardAug 4, 2010 6:23 pm 
Mathieu BouchardAug 16, 2010 9:06 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] GridFlow 9.9
From:Mathieu Bouchard (mat@artengine.ca)
Date:May 16, 2010 8:25:03 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

On Sun, 16 May 2010, patko wrote:

be available in a stable Pd-extended.

I don't understand this argument, there is almost everyday a new pd-extended, that comes up from autobuilds why gridflow changes wouldn't appear on new releases, since the source are taken from svn?

Those releases aren't "stable".

I have nothing against telling people to install a certain Pd-extended autobuild as long as basic stuff like GEM is not broken for over a month at a time. (undefined symbol...)

But that's theoretical, unless you want to take care of those auto-builds of GridFlow.