atom feed11 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.cmisRe: [cmis] Namespace proposal and com...
FromSent OnAttachments
Florent GuillaumeApr 20, 2009 10:27 am 
Al BrownApr 20, 2009 10:59 am.gif, .gif
Choy...@emc.comApr 20, 2009 1:11 pm.gif, .gif, .gif
Julian ReschkeApr 20, 2009 2:17 pm 
Al BrownApr 20, 2009 2:52 pm.gif, .gif
Florent GuillaumeApr 20, 2009 3:16 pm 
Julian ReschkeApr 20, 2009 3:27 pm 
Davi...@emc.comApr 20, 2009 11:43 pm 
Davi...@emc.comApr 20, 2009 11:45 pm 
Julian ReschkeApr 21, 2009 12:31 am 
Julian ReschkeApr 21, 2009 3:05 am 
Subject:Re: [cmis] Namespace proposal and complex properties with lists
From:Al Brown (albe@us.ibm.com)
Date:Apr 20, 2009 2:52:13 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.cmis
Attachments:

As CMIS doesn't have residual properties, would that mean that all of these properties would need to be defined on the document type?

That is a good point. They would have to be on the type definition.

-Al

Al Brown Emerging Standards and Industry Frameworks CMIS: https://w3.tap.ibm.com/w3ki07/display/ECMCMIS/Home Industry Frameworks: https://w3.tap.ibm.com/w3ki07/display/ECMIF/Home

Office 714 327 3453 Mobile 714 263 6441 Email albe@us.ibm.com CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The contents of this message, including any attachments, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the person or entity to whom the message was addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender. Please also permanently delete all copies of the original message and any attached documentation.

From: Julian Reschke <juli@greenbytes.de>

To: Florent Guillaume <fg@nuxeo.com>

Cc: CMIS List <cm@lists.oasis-open.org>

Date: 04/20/2009 02:18 PM

Subject: Re: [cmis] Namespace proposal and complex properties with lists

Hm,

this puts property structure into the identifier. Is this really a good idea?

Florent Guillaume wrote:

Hi all,

Reading the namespace proposal, I feel it could allow for interesting

complex properties with the following small modification. I would like to allow full-digits intermediate "prefixes", in order to have properties named like:

MyRepository:Finance:Orders:42:OrderNumber MyRepository:Finance:Orders:42:OrderTitle MyRepository:Finance:Orders:42:OrderCustomers:0:CustomerId

This would allow exposing complex properties that contain lists of subproperties. ...

As CMIS doesn't have residual properties, would that mean that all of these properties would need to be defined on the document type?

BR, Julian