87 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Growing BGP tables
FromSent OnAttachments
Vincent De KeyzerNov 19, 2004 6:46 am 
Gert DoeringNov 19, 2004 9:01 am 
David J. HughesNov 21, 2004 5:15 pm 
Ryan O'ConnellNov 21, 2004 5:43 pm 
Brian FeenyNov 21, 2004 9:16 pm 
Jon LewisNov 21, 2004 9:49 pm 
Gert DoeringNov 22, 2004 2:55 am 
Ian DickinsonNov 22, 2004 4:11 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 22, 2004 4:52 am 
Ian DickinsonNov 22, 2004 5:47 am 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 6:45 am 
Gert DoeringNov 22, 2004 7:36 am 
Rainer BorromeoNov 22, 2004 8:39 am 
Jared MauchNov 22, 2004 10:19 am 
Gert DoeringNov 22, 2004 11:07 am 
Łukasz BromirskiNov 22, 2004 11:15 am 
Brian FeenyNov 22, 2004 12:04 pm 
Gunther StammwitzNov 22, 2004 1:51 pm 
Jared MauchNov 22, 2004 2:03 pm 
Michael LyngbølNov 22, 2004 2:15 pm 
Gunther StammwitzNov 22, 2004 2:19 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 2:44 pm 
Brian FeenyNov 22, 2004 4:48 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 4:53 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 22, 2004 4:58 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 4:59 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 5:17 pm 
Randy BushNov 22, 2004 5:21 pm 
David J. HughesNov 22, 2004 5:31 pm 
Randy BushNov 22, 2004 5:34 pm 
Brian FeenyNov 22, 2004 5:38 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 22, 2004 8:17 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 22, 2004 8:31 pm 
Michael LyngbølNov 23, 2004 2:44 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 23, 2004 5:10 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 23, 2004 5:10 am 
Gert DoeringNov 23, 2004 5:24 am 
Michael LyngbølNov 23, 2004 5:29 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 23, 2004 5:38 am 
Michael LyngbølNov 23, 2004 5:39 am 
Martin RobinsonNov 23, 2004 5:50 am 
Tantsura, JeffNov 23, 2004 5:51 am 
Neil J. McRaeNov 23, 2004 6:42 am 
Ben CrockerNov 23, 2004 6:54 am 
ege iyiogluNov 23, 2004 9:28 am 
Tantsura, JeffNov 23, 2004 10:17 am 
Rodney DunnNov 23, 2004 10:39 am 
Tantsura, JeffNov 23, 2004 11:12 am 
Rodney DunnNov 23, 2004 11:38 am 
Brian FeenyNov 23, 2004 12:11 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 23, 2004 12:33 pm 
Gert DoeringNov 23, 2004 3:01 pm 
David J. HughesNov 23, 2004 4:42 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 23, 2004 7:33 pm 
Brian FeenyNov 23, 2004 7:37 pm 
David J. HughesNov 23, 2004 8:30 pm 
Mihai CHELARUNov 24, 2004 5:07 am 
Gert DoeringNov 24, 2004 7:27 am 
Rodney DunnNov 24, 2004 8:27 am 
David J. HughesNov 24, 2004 6:28 pm 
Krzysztof AdamskiNov 24, 2004 10:33 pm 
Robert BoyleNov 25, 2004 12:48 am 
Bill WichersNov 25, 2004 12:56 am 
Krzysztof AdamskiNov 25, 2004 9:44 am 
Stephen J. WilcoxNov 26, 2004 9:21 am 
Gert DoeringNov 26, 2004 10:03 am 
Stephen J. WilcoxNov 26, 2004 11:09 am 
Gert DoeringNov 26, 2004 11:20 am 
Stephen J. WilcoxNov 27, 2004 6:53 am 
Rodney DunnNov 30, 2004 6:40 pm 
David J. HughesNov 30, 2004 7:26 pm 
Rodney DunnNov 30, 2004 10:30 pm 
Randy BushDec 1, 2004 12:30 am 
David J. HughesDec 1, 2004 12:57 am 
lee....@census.govDec 1, 2004 8:59 am 
Rodney DunnDec 1, 2004 9:18 am 
lee....@census.govDec 1, 2004 11:18 am 
David J. HughesDec 1, 2004 8:40 pm 
Randy BushDec 1, 2004 8:51 pm 
Rodney DunnJan 27, 2005 11:41 am 
Gert DoeringJan 27, 2005 11:45 am 
Rodney DunnJan 27, 2005 11:48 am 
David J. HughesJan 27, 2005 11:42 pm 
Joe MaimonJan 28, 2005 8:28 am 
Jon LewisJan 28, 2005 9:25 am 
Joe MaimonJan 28, 2005 9:52 am 
Jon LewisJan 28, 2005 10:25 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] Growing BGP tablesActions...
From:Jon Lewis (jle@lewis.org)
Date:Jan 28, 2005 10:25:19 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Joe Maimon wrote:

This is just a less special-case then the below, its the same concept. Here you wish to ignore ALL more specifics, below you wish to ignore more specifics that have either same next-hop, same as-path or whatnot. But still, when Team Cymru withdraws the bogon, you want the decision process to kick in for any routes you had received that were previously more specific.

Perhaps, but that complicates the feature, and in the ideal case,

A) IANA assigns a new /8 to some RIR. B) Cymru removes that /8 from the bogons feed. C) At some later point, the RIR starts assigning subnets of the /8 to its members.

Assuming that order of operations, any subnets within bogon space that you received before B, are bogons and you won't ever want those routes.

If you replace B with your own manually maintained bogons, and if you're slow and don't remove a /8 until after C, then you're going to be in trouble and will have to do some manual form of reset on your peering/transit sessions to get the routes...or rely on much more complicated code to resurrect previously ignored routes.

My point is that the simpler version of this which I proposed is something I bet they could do right now with minimal coding effort. It wouldn't be a perfect solution for all problems of this type, but it would solve the bogons issue right now.