atom feed151 messages in org.w3.public-lodRe: Is 303 really necessary?
FromSent OnAttachments
85 earlier messages
Norman GrayNov 5, 2010 5:11 am 
Dave ReynoldsNov 5, 2010 5:38 am 
NathanNov 5, 2010 5:52 am 
NathanNov 5, 2010 5:56 am 
Vasiliy FaronovNov 5, 2010 6:00 am 
Vasiliy FaronovNov 5, 2010 6:33 am 
NathanNov 5, 2010 7:17 am 
David WoodNov 5, 2010 7:18 am 
Pat HayesNov 5, 2010 7:27 am 
Ian DavisNov 5, 2010 8:12 am 
Kingsley IdehenNov 5, 2010 8:18 am 
NathanNov 5, 2010 8:39 am 
Kingsley IdehenNov 5, 2010 9:35 am 
Pat HayesNov 5, 2010 10:29 am 
Kingsley IdehenNov 5, 2010 10:30 am 
NathanNov 5, 2010 10:37 am 
Hugh GlaserNov 5, 2010 10:50 am 
David BoothNov 6, 2010 1:41 pm 
Norman GrayNov 6, 2010 3:45 pm 
Kingsley IdehenNov 6, 2010 4:07 pm 
David BoothNov 7, 2010 10:27 pm 
David BoothNov 7, 2010 10:27 pm 
Tore ErikssonNov 7, 2010 11:17 pm 
Toby InksterNov 8, 2010 12:36 am 
Toby InksterNov 8, 2010 2:10 am 
David BoothNov 8, 2010 6:39 am 
David BoothNov 8, 2010 6:42 am 
Norman GrayNov 8, 2010 7:51 am 
Toby InksterNov 8, 2010 8:03 am 
David BoothNov 8, 2010 12:33 pm 
Lars HeuerNov 8, 2010 1:16 pm 
David BoothNov 8, 2010 1:35 pm 
Dave ReynoldsNov 8, 2010 1:50 pm 
David BoothNov 8, 2010 3:34 pm 
Tore ErikssonNov 8, 2010 5:51 pm 
Dave ReynoldsNov 9, 2010 6:36 am 
Lars HeuerNov 9, 2010 8:00 am 
Kjetil KjernsmoNov 10, 2010 7:13 am 
Jason BorroNov 11, 2010 11:47 am 
David BoothNov 18, 2010 2:09 pm 
Kingsley IdehenNov 19, 2010 4:25 am 
David BoothNov 19, 2010 1:55 pm 
Kingsley IdehenNov 19, 2010 2:07 pm 
NathanNov 19, 2010 2:57 pm 
Kingsley IdehenNov 19, 2010 5:55 pm 
Bob FerrisNov 26, 2010 6:15 am 
NathanNov 26, 2010 6:29 am 
David BoothNov 26, 2010 9:32 am 
David BoothNov 26, 2010 9:48 am 
Kingsley IdehenNov 26, 2010 12:36 pm 
William WaitesNov 26, 2010 1:47 pm 
Kingsley IdehenNov 26, 2010 6:05 pm 
Richard LightNov 27, 2010 4:47 am 
Tim Berners-LeeNov 27, 2010 12:24 pm 
William WaitesNov 28, 2010 5:47 am 
Giovanni TummarelloNov 28, 2010 5:51 am 
Jiří ProcházkaNov 28, 2010 6:46 am 
Tim Berners-LeeNov 28, 2010 7:07 am 
Kingsley IdehenNov 28, 2010 9:45 am 
Jiří ProcházkaNov 28, 2010 12:51 pm 
Toby InksterNov 28, 2010 3:27 pm 
Kingsley IdehenNov 28, 2010 3:47 pm 
Jiří ProcházkaNov 28, 2010 4:51 pm 
Kingsley IdehenNov 28, 2010 5:15 pm 
James LeighNov 29, 2010 5:54 am 
Bob FerrisDec 14, 2010 2:54 pm 
Subject:Re: Is 303 really necessary?
From:Kingsley Idehen (kide@openlinksw.com)
Date:Nov 26, 2010 12:36:55 pm
List:org.w3.public-lod

On 11/26/10 12:49 PM, David Booth wrote:

On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 14:30 +0000, Nathan wrote:

http://webr3.org/apps/notes/web#atypedlink

partial story of creating /a/ semantic web, rather than /the/ semantic web.

Thanks for posting this. I like the reasoning, but one part I think is overstated to the point of being incorrect:

"It is critical to note, that you cannot name real world things with URIs, you cannot name the moon with a URI, just as you cannot send the moon through a computer."

You later discuss the idea of using a URI to name something *as-described-by* a document, and this I think is a very good point to make. But I don't think it invalidates the idea that you can name real world things with URIs. I suggest toning down the above statement and further explaining the idea that the identity of a resource may not be unambiguously determined, but it is determined only to the extent that its description determines it.

Nathan,

I have a URI. I don't have a URL. A document describing me has a URL. A description has to occur on a surface (Document) otherwise it cannot be perceived by any beholder. The Subject of a description has to be distinct from its projector otherwise beholders are stuck with low- or no-resolution style projection. The Moon can have a URI that indicates its the Subject of a documented description.

There is a trinity that cannot be broken when it comes to structured descriptions: Referent, Identifier, Document . This has been so long before the WWW came into existence.

Real World Entities have always had Identifiers. URIs don't change this reality. That's an accepted fact in a broad range of universes of discourse -- which includes AWWW .

A description of the Moon with a URI for Moon never implies the moon will come zooming out of the Web. It just means: an observer of the Moon can use Attribute=Value pairs to describe the Moon (referent) via a Document by coalescing these Attribute=Value pairs around the Moon's Identifier (Name).

If said observer performs the above in machine readable form, he/she is basically entering into the realm of EAV based structured data. Add hypermedia to the mix re., Documentation medium and we have Linked Data.

I have never read a note by TimBL that's indicated that you can't give URIs to real world objects. Ditto W3C.

I've never encountered any computer literature relating to Distributed Objects or Object Orientation that's indicated Data Objects, Entities, Data Items are devoid of Identity.

"Resource" overloading bug continues to haunt Semantic Web and Linked Data communications and comprehension :-)

Again, we can't break the trinity: Referent, Identifier, Document -- which is the container, disseminator, and projector of Content defined by a Model that is logic based re., hypermedia based structured data.

Roy Fielding wasn't describing Linked Data (Distributed Data Objects) in his famous thesis. He was describing a better approach to Document Oriented Client-Server Middleware via HTTP.

The Document Oriented Middleware vs Remote Procedure Calls Oriented middleware has been raging for eons, long before WWW. This subject matter is a vast realm on to itself re. history. Today, we talk about REST vs SOAP, without always knowing that they're just today's monikers for an age-old battle in the realm of Client-Server Middleware.

Regards,