| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| 85 earlier messages | ||
| Norman Gray | Nov 5, 2010 5:11 am | |
| Dave Reynolds | Nov 5, 2010 5:38 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 5:52 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 5:56 am | |
| Vasiliy Faronov | Nov 5, 2010 6:00 am | |
| Vasiliy Faronov | Nov 5, 2010 6:33 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 7:17 am | |
| David Wood | Nov 5, 2010 7:18 am | |
| Pat Hayes | Nov 5, 2010 7:27 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 5, 2010 8:12 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 5, 2010 8:18 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 8:39 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 5, 2010 9:35 am | |
| Pat Hayes | Nov 5, 2010 10:29 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 5, 2010 10:30 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 10:37 am | |
| Hugh Glaser | Nov 5, 2010 10:50 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 6, 2010 1:41 pm | |
| Norman Gray | Nov 6, 2010 3:45 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 6, 2010 4:07 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 7, 2010 10:27 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 7, 2010 10:27 pm | |
| Tore Eriksson | Nov 7, 2010 11:17 pm | |
| Toby Inkster | Nov 8, 2010 12:36 am | |
| Toby Inkster | Nov 8, 2010 2:10 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 6:39 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 6:42 am | |
| Norman Gray | Nov 8, 2010 7:51 am | |
| Toby Inkster | Nov 8, 2010 8:03 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 12:33 pm | |
| Lars Heuer | Nov 8, 2010 1:16 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 1:35 pm | |
| Dave Reynolds | Nov 8, 2010 1:50 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 3:34 pm | |
| Tore Eriksson | Nov 8, 2010 5:51 pm | |
| Dave Reynolds | Nov 9, 2010 6:36 am | |
| Lars Heuer | Nov 9, 2010 8:00 am | |
| Kjetil Kjernsmo | Nov 10, 2010 7:13 am | |
| Jason Borro | Nov 11, 2010 11:47 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 18, 2010 2:09 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 19, 2010 4:25 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 19, 2010 1:55 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 19, 2010 2:07 pm | |
| Nathan | Nov 19, 2010 2:57 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 19, 2010 5:55 pm | |
| Bob Ferris | Nov 26, 2010 6:15 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 26, 2010 6:29 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 26, 2010 9:32 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 26, 2010 9:48 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 26, 2010 12:36 pm | |
| William Waites | Nov 26, 2010 1:47 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 26, 2010 6:05 pm | |
| Richard Light | Nov 27, 2010 4:47 am | |
| Tim Berners-Lee | Nov 27, 2010 12:24 pm | |
| William Waites | Nov 28, 2010 5:47 am | |
| Giovanni Tummarello | Nov 28, 2010 5:51 am | |
| Jiří Procházka | Nov 28, 2010 6:46 am | |
| Tim Berners-Lee | Nov 28, 2010 7:07 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 28, 2010 9:45 am | |
| Jiří Procházka | Nov 28, 2010 12:51 pm | |
| Toby Inkster | Nov 28, 2010 3:27 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 28, 2010 3:47 pm | |
| Jiří Procházka | Nov 28, 2010 4:51 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 28, 2010 5:15 pm | |
| James Leigh | Nov 29, 2010 5:54 am | |
| Bob Ferris | Dec 14, 2010 2:54 pm | |
| Subject: | Re: Is 303 really necessary? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Kingsley Idehen (kide...@openlinksw.com) | |
| Date: | Nov 26, 2010 12:36:55 pm | |
| List: | org.w3.public-lod | |
On 11/26/10 12:49 PM, David Booth wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 14:30 +0000, Nathan wrote:
http://webr3.org/apps/notes/web#atypedlink
partial story of creating /a/ semantic web, rather than /the/ semantic web.
Thanks for posting this. I like the reasoning, but one part I think is overstated to the point of being incorrect:
"It is critical to note, that you cannot name real world things with URIs, you cannot name the moon with a URI, just as you cannot send the moon through a computer."
You later discuss the idea of using a URI to name something *as-described-by* a document, and this I think is a very good point to make. But I don't think it invalidates the idea that you can name real world things with URIs. I suggest toning down the above statement and further explaining the idea that the identity of a resource may not be unambiguously determined, but it is determined only to the extent that its description determines it.
Nathan,
I have a URI. I don't have a URL. A document describing me has a URL. A description has to occur on a surface (Document) otherwise it cannot be perceived by any beholder. The Subject of a description has to be distinct from its projector otherwise beholders are stuck with low- or no-resolution style projection. The Moon can have a URI that indicates its the Subject of a documented description.
There is a trinity that cannot be broken when it comes to structured descriptions: Referent, Identifier, Document . This has been so long before the WWW came into existence.
Real World Entities have always had Identifiers. URIs don't change this reality. That's an accepted fact in a broad range of universes of discourse -- which includes AWWW .
A description of the Moon with a URI for Moon never implies the moon will come zooming out of the Web. It just means: an observer of the Moon can use Attribute=Value pairs to describe the Moon (referent) via a Document by coalescing these Attribute=Value pairs around the Moon's Identifier (Name).
If said observer performs the above in machine readable form, he/she is basically entering into the realm of EAV based structured data. Add hypermedia to the mix re., Documentation medium and we have Linked Data.
I have never read a note by TimBL that's indicated that you can't give URIs to real world objects. Ditto W3C.
I've never encountered any computer literature relating to Distributed Objects or Object Orientation that's indicated Data Objects, Entities, Data Items are devoid of Identity.
"Resource" overloading bug continues to haunt Semantic Web and Linked Data communications and comprehension :-)
Again, we can't break the trinity: Referent, Identifier, Document -- which is the container, disseminator, and projector of Content defined by a Model that is logic based re., hypermedia based structured data.
Roy Fielding wasn't describing Linked Data (Distributed Data Objects) in his famous thesis. He was describing a better approach to Document Oriented Client-Server Middleware via HTTP.
The Document Oriented Middleware vs Remote Procedure Calls Oriented middleware has been raging for eons, long before WWW. This subject matter is a vast realm on to itself re. history. Today, we talk about REST vs SOAP, without always knowing that they're just today's monikers for an age-old battle in the realm of Client-Server Middleware.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen





