| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 25, 2009 10:21 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 25, 2009 12:56 pm | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 25, 2009 2:20 pm | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 25, 2009 2:43 pm | |
| Igor Sysoev | Jul 27, 2009 2:47 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 27, 2009 2:48 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 27, 2009 8:57 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 27, 2009 8:59 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 27, 2009 10:47 am | |
| Daniel | Jul 27, 2009 9:09 pm | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 27, 2009 10:51 pm | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 27, 2009 11:03 pm | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 27, 2009 11:07 pm | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 27, 2009 11:14 pm | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 27, 2009 11:21 pm | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 28, 2009 12:38 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 28, 2009 12:41 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 28, 2009 3:45 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 28, 2009 3:54 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 28, 2009 10:14 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 28, 2009 10:16 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 30, 2009 3:27 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Jul 30, 2009 4:35 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 30, 2009 9:47 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Jul 30, 2009 9:51 am | |
| Daniel | Aug 6, 2009 8:33 pm | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Aug 7, 2009 3:58 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Aug 7, 2009 10:15 am | .patch |
| Daniel | Aug 10, 2009 1:54 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Aug 10, 2009 11:14 am | .patch |
| Daniel | Aug 10, 2009 10:08 pm | |
| gogobu | Aug 30, 2009 12:46 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Aug 30, 2009 1:56 am | |
| gogobu | Aug 30, 2009 5:44 am | |
| Valery Kholodkov | Aug 30, 2009 6:41 am | |
| gogobu | Aug 30, 2009 8:15 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Aug 30, 2009 11:32 am | |
| davent | Aug 31, 2009 8:56 am |
| Subject: | Re: mogilefs module 1.0.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Michael Shadle (mike...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Jul 27, 2009 11:07:16 pm | |
| List: | ru.sysoev.nginx | |
Are there any limitations on file size?
What's the largest you've tested with?
Can the domain be an nginx $variable?
Where does $mogilefs_path come from? Is that a field that comes from the upload form? Perhaps that negates the need for the last question then... Although it allows the client to mess with the post field and alter the location.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Valery Kholodkov <valery+ngin...@grid.net.ru
wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Hi Valery, I just installed the module and recompiled nginx, set the config file as in the example from your site. Now i can download the files from reverse proxy directly. Very Cool. Thanks a lot. Can you give us examples of the config to push files into the mogilefs storage?.
location /upload/ { mogilefs_tracker tracker; mogilefs_domain domain; mogilefs_methods PUT; mogilefs_pass { proxy_pass $mogilefs_path; } }
Yes, but making a mogstored node out of it is a bad idea.
I'm using nginx as a mogstored frontend without problems.
It wasn't about nginx, it was about using nginx+mogilefs module as storage node.
Tuqui Valery Kholodkov さんは書きました:
Hello Michael!
Michael Shadle wrote:
Ah, so the module does all the work, instead of the client contacting the tracker, and the tracker using the nginx-based mogstored; this actually takes the file itself and pushes it into the mogilefs system for you?
Yes, this is what it was written for.
I suppose that's a pretty cool feature then. Anything to keep configuration light and usability the easiest.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Valery Kholodkov<valery+ngin...@grid.net.ru> wrote:
This is to use nginx as a frontend to MogileFS and hide interaction with the tracker while store files.
----- Michael Shadle <mike...@gmail.com> wrote:
Just for discussion sake why is that? I actually have the same instance of nginx with two separate http{} blocks. One for mogstored and one for normal web serving. It might even be possible to have it under the same http block. I never looked into it that much.
I guess explaining the pros and cons of doing it that way vs. Using the module would be good info to know.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 25, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Valery Kholodkov <valery+ngin...@grid.net.ru
wrote:
Yes, but making a mogstored node out of it is a bad idea.
Michael Shadle wrote:
So this means this module now handles the DAV requests as well, so it can be a mogstored node? nginx technically already supported that :) However this could be more efficient, etc. I'm wondering if I am understanding this properly. On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Valery Kholodkov<valery+ngin...@grid.net.ru> wrote:
Changes in version 1.0.2 (July 25 2009): * Added feature: directive mogilefs_methods and support for PUT and DELETE methods * Added feature: dynamic evaluation of tracker name * Added feature: ability to pass noverify parameter to tracker
The first 2 features were commissioned by GG Network SA (gadu-gadu.pl ). These features allow write access to MogileFS using nginx, as well as locating of tracker dynamically. The Gadu-Gadu developers were very kind to test these features. Hopefully there are no major issues.
The noverify parameter instructs MogileFS tracker to avoid querying the database for location of files if possible and use cached results, thus eliminating some of the database server load.
The details on the following page: http://www.grid.net.ru/nginx/mogilefs.en.html
Feel free to contact me if you have problems with this!
-- Best regards, Valery Kholodkov






.patch