atom feed4 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.soa-eerpRe: [soa-eerp] Changes required to su...
FromSent OnAttachments
Kim GoolsbyOct 12, 2010 7:21 am 
William CoxOct 12, 2010 8:48 am 
Kim GoolsbyOct 12, 2010 9:36 am 
Mary McRaeOct 12, 2010 10:12 am 
Subject:Re: [soa-eerp] Changes required to submitted document - SOA-EERP Business Quality of Service Version 1.0
From:Mary McRae (mary@oasis-open.org)
Date:Oct 12, 2010 10:12:09 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.soa-eerp

I have nothing to do with it. It's up to the TC to decide what they reference.
Our only job is to make sure that the citations are in the correct format and
point to valid URIs. :)

Mary

On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Kim Goolsby wrote:

If this works for Mary, I'll change my suggestion for CEFACT to your preferred
link: http://www.unece.org/cefact/recommendations/rec09/rec09_ecetrd203.pdf

Thank you.

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:48 AM, William Cox <wtc@coxsoftwarearchitects.com>
wrote: regarding currency codes:

CEFACT now says use a normative reference to ISO 4217, which contains the
currency and country codes.

Reference should be to ISO 4217, per CEFACT. The code list Recommendation 9 is
at http://www.unece.org/cefact/recommendations/rec09/rec09_ecetrd203.pdf

Here's a note from a draft NAESB Standard in process:

The ISO 4217 code indicating the currency applicable to the bill amounts in the
summary. See list at
http://www.unece.org/cefact/recommendations/rec09/rec09_ecetrd203.pdf From page 96 of the CEFACT recommendation in Kim's email
(http://www.unece.org/cefact/ebxml/CCTS_V2-01_Final.pdf ) which is Core
Components rather than Currency Codes: Currency. Identifier Reference UN/ECE Rec. 9, using 3-letter alphabetic codes. The UN/ECE Rec. 9 is also published as ISO 4217, but is available in electronic form and free of charge.

So if all that's referenced are currency codes, either ISO 4217 or Rec. 9 works,
and I'd prefer the ISO 4217 reference of the two.

On 10/12/10 10:21 AM, Kim Goolsby wrote:

TCADMIN-252

Hi all,

My comments below contain required changes plus suggestions. The suggestions are
just that, suggestions only.

Please make the following changes to this document:

1. In 'This Version', please update the underlying URIs to the current version.
Change from
http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-eerp/bqos/v1.0/SOA-EERP-bQoS-Spec-wd09.xxx to
http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-eerp/bqos/v1.0/SOA-EERP-bQoS-Spec-cd04.xxx. That
is, change /wd09/ to /cd04/.

2. In the footer, please correct the spelling of September.

3. In the 'Technical Committee' section, please change text from bold to regular
weight.

4. In 'Related Work', the first bullet contains a broken link. Please change
from
http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-eerp/rt/v1.0/SOA-EERP-bRating-Specification.pdf
to
http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-eerp/rt/v1.0/SOA-EERP-Rating-Specification.pdf,
removing the errant 'b' from 'bRating'. Note that this was correct in the
previous version.

5. In 'Normative References', please activate the link for [UBL-20]. Note that
this was correct in the previous version.

6. Also, in 'Normative References', I suggest adding the date to [UBL-20-cbc].
The date is October 2006.

7. Also, in 'Normative References', I suggest adding the date to [UBL-20-udt].
The date is February 2005.

8. Also in 'Normative References', [CEFACT] contains an incomplete title and a
broken link. This was also true in the last version. I suggest updating with
correct information. According to wikipedia, the latest version is
http://www.unece.org/cefact/ebxml/CCTS_V2-01_Final.pdf, dated November 2003.

9. Also in 'Normative References', for [SOA-RM], please activate the actual URI
to the document rather than the document title.

10. Please generate an html version of this document in addition to word & pdf
versions.

Please contact me with any questions or comments.

Best regards, Kim