| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Mathieu Bouchard | Sep 23, 2005 11:17 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Sep 29, 2005 11:16 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Sep 29, 2005 11:29 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Sep 29, 2005 11:30 pm | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Sep 30, 2005 12:42 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Sep 30, 2005 12:55 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Sep 30, 2005 2:19 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Sep 30, 2005 2:22 am | |
| Thomas Grill | Sep 30, 2005 2:30 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Sep 30, 2005 3:15 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Sep 30, 2005 3:54 am | |
| David Plans Casal | Sep 30, 2005 4:24 am | |
| Tim Blechmann | Sep 30, 2005 4:36 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 3, 2005 9:27 pm | |
| David Plans Casal | Oct 4, 2005 12:48 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Oct 5, 2005 9:44 pm | |
| David Plans Casal | Oct 5, 2005 11:58 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Oct 6, 2005 4:55 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 6, 2005 11:45 am | |
| Guenter Geiger | Oct 6, 2005 12:21 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Oct 6, 2005 12:35 pm | |
| Thomas Grill | Oct 6, 2005 1:35 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Oct 6, 2005 4:42 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 7, 2005 8:24 am | |
| David Plans Casal | Oct 7, 2005 8:52 am | |
| Guenter Geiger | Oct 7, 2005 9:16 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 7, 2005 9:01 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 7, 2005 9:42 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 7, 2005 11:22 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Oct 8, 2005 4:48 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Oct 10, 2005 5:28 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [PD-dev] uninitialized values bug | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Mathieu Bouchard (mat...@artengine.ca) | |
| Date: | Sep 30, 2005 12:55:54 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-dev | |
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
What's the purpose of providing a diff if everyone who wants the feature can also get devel-pd with very little additional effort ?
The reason for providing patches/diffs was discussed a lot on pd~convention: It makes it much easier to get bugfixes etc. into the most used version of Pd, that is MSP Pd - both for Miller and for users who for whatever reason don't want to or can switch to devel_039, DesireData, PureEvil or so.
I have a few questions for everybody.
What's my incentive to serve those users?
What were the assumptions underlying the discussion at PureData Convention? Are those assumptions valid?
Why shouldn't more users use devel_0_39 ?
Why should I make efforts to contribute to a branch I don't plan to continue to use, and that I wish gets replaced by devel_0_39 in day-to-day use?
But your changes for uninitialized values sound like a simple bugfix, where a patch would be possible and a nice thing to do.
That's cool, it means that you just found one nice thing that you could do for Miller and normal users who have a compiler but don't want to check out devel_0_39 and enjoy applying diffs that Miller hasn't applied himself.
____________________________________________________________________ Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada





