atom feed161 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re...
FromSent OnAttachments
65 earlier messages
Luke IanniniFeb 18, 2009 2:10 am 
Martin PeachFeb 18, 2009 5:37 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 6:00 am 
Martin PeachFeb 18, 2009 6:09 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 6:21 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 18, 2009 7:02 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:00 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:01 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:35 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:39 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:59 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 10:28 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:30 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:42 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:55 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 18, 2009 10:56 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 18, 2009 10:58 am 
cyrille henryFeb 18, 2009 11:01 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 11:19 am 
cyrille henryFeb 18, 2009 11:28 am 
cyrille henryFeb 18, 2009 11:35 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 11:57 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 12:06 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 12:07 pm 
Matt BarberFeb 18, 2009 12:17 pm 
Martin PeachFeb 18, 2009 1:39 pm 
Andy FarnellFeb 18, 2009 1:46 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 18, 2009 3:39 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 18, 2009 3:49 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 18, 2009 4:03 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 18, 2009 4:32 pm 
marius schebellaFeb 18, 2009 10:41 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 18, 2009 11:16 pm 
marius schebellaFeb 18, 2009 11:27 pm 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 11:47 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 12:45 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 12:50 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 12:52 am 
Damian StewartFeb 19, 2009 12:53 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 12:55 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 1:00 am 
Matt BarberFeb 19, 2009 1:15 am 
cyrille henryFeb 19, 2009 2:07 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 19, 2009 6:04 am 
Martin PeachFeb 19, 2009 6:14 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 19, 2009 7:21 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 9:27 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 19, 2009 10:15 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 19, 2009 10:28 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 19, 2009 3:10 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 19, 2009 3:26 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 9:33 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 9:40 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 9:48 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 10:07 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 10:08 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 19, 2009 10:09 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 19, 2009 11:06 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 20, 2009 12:48 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 20, 2009 12:59 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 20, 2009 1:21 am 
João PaisFeb 20, 2009 2:10 am.xls
Claude Heiland-AllenFeb 20, 2009 6:23 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 20, 2009 7:18 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 22, 2009 2:53 am 
João PaisFeb 22, 2009 2:57 pm 
João PaisFeb 22, 2009 3:11 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 22, 2009 3:43 pm 
cyrille henryFeb 22, 2009 4:49 pm 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 22, 2009 5:32 pm 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 22, 2009 6:09 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 22, 2009 8:50 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 22, 2009 9:02 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 23, 2009 12:34 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 23, 2009 1:03 am 
cyrille henryFeb 23, 2009 2:53 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 23, 2009 3:21 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 23, 2009 3:37 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 23, 2009 3:58 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 23, 2009 5:04 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 23, 2009 5:19 am 
cyrille henryFeb 23, 2009 9:27 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 23, 2009 9:48 am 
Loic KessousFeb 23, 2009 11:33 am 
João PaisFeb 23, 2009 12:52 pm 
João PaisFeb 23, 2009 1:10 pm 
cyrille henryFeb 23, 2009 3:16 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 23, 2009 4:07 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 23, 2009 4:14 pm 
Loic KessousFeb 24, 2009 4:06 am 
cyrille henryFeb 24, 2009 8:48 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 24, 2009 5:05 pm 
cyrille henryFeb 25, 2009 2:00 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 25, 2009 7:29 am 
cyrille henryFeb 25, 2009 10:22 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 25, 2009 11:37 am 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re: stripping down Pd-extended's default libs]
From:Roman Haefeli (redu@yahoo.de)
Date:Feb 19, 2009 3:10:05 pm
List:at.iem.pd-dev

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 09:46 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

i think, that the question, why a new object [pack] is named pack is not rhetoric at all and isn't answered yet. so lets go again: why is [pack] from zexy called [pack]?

because it is meant as a fully backwards-compatible replacement of [pack], with added features. since i have been repeating this for several times now, i would be interested in the precise part of the above sentence that is unclear to you.

i think, i understand that sentence, but still cannot see the goal of calling it the same. i mean, giving it the same name is of no use for your old (pre-zexy-[unpack]) patches, since they were not aware of the new features of zexy's [unpack], when they were created, thus they also would work with the pd's [unpack] today. on the other hand, for new patches, that potentionally profit from the added features of [unpack], it wouldn't have been any additional effort to write each time [zunpack] (or whatsoever) instead of [unpack]. so the only goal of it, that i can see is, that you deliberately want to confuse yourself, which i believe wasn't your reason to call it [unpack]. back to the orignal question....

roman