Messages per Month
11 messages in org.apache.commons.devRe: [logging] JCL2.0 design - API| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Kitching | Feb 19, 2006 3:29 pm | |
| Boris Unckel | Feb 20, 2006 1:37 am | |
| V. Karthik Kumar | Feb 20, 2006 2:05 am | |
| Emmanuel Bourg | Mar 1, 2006 2:18 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Mar 1, 2006 9:05 am | |
| Emmanuel Bourg | Mar 1, 2006 9:22 am | |
| Simon Kitching | Mar 1, 2006 11:11 am | |
| Emmanuel Bourg | Mar 2, 2006 1:20 am | |
| Boris Unckel | Mar 2, 2006 3:35 am | |
| Emmanuel Bourg | Mar 2, 2006 6:25 am | |
| Boris Unckel | Mar 2, 2006 6:30 am |
| Subject: | Re: [logging] JCL2.0 design - API | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Boris Unckel (bori...@gmx.net) | |
| Date: | Mar 2, 2006 6:30:47 am | |
| List: | org.apache.commons.dev | |
Von: Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> Boris Unckel wrote:
To turn Log into an abstract class means that no native implementation will ever be possible. It would definitly mean that you will need an wrapper class. Currently there is just x4juli supporting native JCL support for java.util.logging (X4JuliLogger extends jul.Logger implements JCL). But this is also a chance for log4j2.
What do you mean by "native" implementation ? Do you mean a multiple inheritance to implement the Log type from JCL and the Logger type from java.util.logging ?
Yes: X4JuliLogger extends jul.Logger implements JCL
Have a look
at:
http://svn.berlios.de/viewcvs/x4juli/trunk/src/java/org/x4juli/X4JuliLogger.java?view=markup
Regards Boris