| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 2:48 am | |
| Oliver Fromme | Oct 8, 2003 3:43 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 8, 2003 5:24 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 8, 2003 5:39 am | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:19 am | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:24 am | |
| Oliver Fromme | Oct 8, 2003 8:54 am | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Oct 8, 2003 10:23 am | |
| Ken Smith | Oct 8, 2003 12:42 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:39 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:43 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:54 pm | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Oct 9, 2003 5:13 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 9, 2003 9:04 am |
| Subject: | ISO names (Was: 4.9-RC2 is on ftp-master..) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Daniel C. Sobral (dc...@tcoip.com.br) | |
| Date: | Oct 8, 2003 10:23:36 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-hubs | |
Murray Stokely wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:38:13AM -0300, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s wrote:
I've been studying the availability of FreeBSD ISOs on edonkey networks, and, surprise, I just noted that the ISO has no "FreeBSD" on its name.
What do you think of changing the names to:
I think it is redundant since the files are living in /pub/FreeBSD. If you move them someplace where FreeBSD it no longer part of the namespace, then sure, it probably makes sense for you to add FreeBSD back into the name.
Well, you are thinking of FTP. Jo?o is referring to P2P applications, some of which are particularly well suited to the fast distribution on very large files, and in those the concept of the "directory" the files are in may be non-existent.





