2 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: Problem with sqwe...
FromSent OnAttachments
Grzegorz JanoszkaNov 28, 2004 3:44 pm 
Grzegorz JanoszkaNov 29, 2004 9:49 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[courier-users] Re: Problem with sqwebmail (Courier 0.47)Actions...
From:Grzegorz Janoszka (Grze@pro.onet.pl)
Date:Nov 29, 2004 9:49:51 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:

The webmail system is temporarily unavailable. An error occured in function write: Transport endpoint is not connected

I have found one difference in strace /usr/lib/cgi-bin/sqwebmail:

Box with correct sqwebmail: connect(3, {sin_family=AF_UNIX, path="/var/run/courier/sqwebmail.sock"}, 110) Box with broken sqwebmail: connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/courier/sqwebmail.sock"}, 110)

The difference is that right sqwebmail opens socket as a unix and the broken as file, but I thougt AF_UNIX is just an alias to AF_FILE.

The right box has libc 2.2.5 and the broken has libc 2.3.2. Apache and Courier versions are the same. Can libc break sqwebmail?

-- Grzegorz Janoszka