atom feed7 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.officeRe: [office] the simple proposal: for...
FromSent OnAttachments
Dave PawsonJul 14, 2008 4:31 am 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 14, 2008 5:27 am 
Dave PawsonJul 14, 2008 5:45 am 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 14, 2008 6:03 am 
Dave PawsonJul 14, 2008 6:26 am 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 14, 2008 7:02 am 
Dave PawsonJul 14, 2008 7:17 am 
Subject:Re: [office] the simple proposal: forwards compatibility
From:Dave Pawson (dave@gmail.com)
Date:Jul 14, 2008 5:45:38 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.office

2008/7/14 <robe@us.ibm.com>:

"Dave Pawson" <dave@gmail.com> wrote on 07/14/2008 07:31:22 AM:

What should a 1.2 application do with content from 2.0?

Perhaps we can add some language to ODF 1.2 for how an ODF 1.2 processor should process unknown elements from ODF 1.3.+. However, we can't, in any formal way, tell an ODF 1.0 processor what to do with ODF 1.2 documents, since we cannot change the ODF 1.0 specification.

Lots of things the TC could do.

If 1.2 defines a clear action on 'forwards compatibility' that might act as guidance for retroactive action on forwards compatability?

I'll post a comment to the comments list if that might help getting it on the TC's agenda.

I see it as a shortcoming of the current spec.

regards