atom feed19 messages in org.w3.xproc-devRe: Fileutils
FromSent OnAttachments
Norman WalshMay 25, 2009 11:58 am 
David A. LeeMay 25, 2009 2:21 pm 
Norman WalshMay 25, 2009 2:26 pm 
Norman WalshMay 25, 2009 3:11 pm 
Dave PawsonMay 25, 2009 10:04 pm 
mozerMay 25, 2009 11:34 pm 
Toma...@emc.comMay 26, 2009 12:19 am 
Norman WalshMay 26, 2009 5:06 am 
Norman WalshMay 26, 2009 5:07 am 
Norman WalshMay 26, 2009 5:09 am 
Dave PawsonMay 26, 2009 6:49 am 
Norman WalshMay 29, 2009 4:27 am 
Toma...@emc.comMay 29, 2009 4:47 am 
James FullerJun 1, 2009 5:07 am 
Leif WarnerJun 1, 2009 9:28 am 
James FullerJun 1, 2009 9:43 am 
Norman WalshJun 1, 2009 9:43 am 
James FullerJun 1, 2009 10:17 am 
Norman WalshJun 1, 2009 11:22 am 
Subject:Re: Fileutils
From:Norman Walsh (nd@nwalsh.com)
Date:May 25, 2009 2:26:49 pm
List:org.w3.xproc-dev

"David A. Lee" <dl@calldei.com> writes:

One titdbit of an oppinion. I suggest the difference between "move" and "rename" is archaic and unnecessary. you only really need "move" ...

Yeah, I don't feel strongly about it. Only having "move" does introduce some complexity wrt directories though.

Be seeing you, norm

-- Norman Walsh <nd@nwalsh.com> | The best people usually owe their http://nwalsh.com/ | excellence to a combination of | qualities which might have been | supposed incompatible.--Bertrand Russell