| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Fortin | Jul 12, 2001 2:48 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jul 12, 2001 2:51 pm | |
| Matt Dillon | Jul 12, 2001 2:58 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jul 12, 2001 3:14 pm | |
| Albert D. Cahalan | Jul 12, 2001 7:04 pm | |
| Steve Price | Jul 12, 2001 7:13 pm | |
| Albert D. Cahalan | Jul 12, 2001 7:38 pm | |
| Steve Price | Jul 12, 2001 8:02 pm | |
| steve | Jul 12, 2001 8:58 pm | |
| Steve Price | Jul 12, 2001 9:25 pm | |
| Bill Moran | Jul 12, 2001 9:34 pm | |
| steve | Jul 12, 2001 9:52 pm | |
| Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group | Jul 13, 2001 6:27 pm | |
| Bruce Burden | Jul 13, 2001 7:19 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jul 13, 2001 7:26 pm | |
| Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group | Jul 13, 2001 7:48 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jul 13, 2001 7:56 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jul 13, 2001 8:10 pm | |
| Josh Paetzel | Jul 13, 2001 8:53 pm | |
| Lamont Granquist | Jul 13, 2001 11:58 pm | |
| Mark Blackman | Jul 15, 2001 10:09 am | |
| Nick Sayer | Jul 16, 2001 8:00 am | |
| Karsten W. Rohrbach | Jul 17, 2001 11:04 am |
| Subject: | Re: RE: Regarding New FreeBSD BenchMark From Sysadmin Mag (left out a fiew tuning options) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Matt Dillon (dil...@earth.backplane.com) | |
| Date: | Jul 12, 2001 2:58:41 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-stable | |
::: hw.ata.wc = 1 : :How do you enable write-caching on SCSI drives? The camcontrol man page :is a bit cryptic...
SCSI drives have tags, you don't have to lift a finger. Turning on write caching on top of using tags is extremely dangerous anyway, much more dangerous then turning on write caching for an (untagged) IDE drive.
::: net.inet.tcp.keepidle=10000 ::: net.inet.tcp.keepintvl=10000
This will be irrelevant for the benchmark they ran. It is related to keepalive timeouts that terminate dead TCP connections.
:What do these do? : ::: vm.pageout_algorithm=1 : :Ditto...? ;-)
Don't mess with that, it's magic :-). No, actually, changing it just changes the pageout algorithm to strict LRU, which you almost never want to do. It will not have any effect on the benchmark since they were not stressing memory and it would probably be detrimental if they were stressing memory.
::: ::: as for mount options, "noatime". : :Don't think any Linux distro defaults to noatime mounts, and in Win2K, :you have to hack the Registry to disable Last Access Timestamps. : :-- Juha
atime/noatime would have no effect on the benchmark anyway. Or not much of one, anyway.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message





