atom feed55 messages in org.w3.ietf-http-wgRe: issue 85 - range unit extensions
FromSent OnAttachments
Mark NottinghamJul 28, 2008 5:58 am 
Frank EllermannJul 28, 2008 7:11 am 
Mark NottinghamJul 28, 2008 7:54 am 
Frank EllermannJul 28, 2008 11:05 am 
Mark NottinghamJul 28, 2008 3:14 pm 
Julian ReschkeAug 5, 2008 9:21 am 
Brian SmithAug 5, 2008 9:50 am 
Yves LafonAug 5, 2008 10:27 am 
Julian ReschkeAug 5, 2008 11:06 am 
Jamie LokierAug 5, 2008 11:29 am 
Yves LafonAug 5, 2008 12:25 pm 
Lisa DusseaultAug 6, 2008 10:40 am 
Mark NottinghamAug 8, 2008 12:26 am 
Julian ReschkeAug 8, 2008 1:10 am 
Larry MasinterAug 8, 2008 2:48 am 
Julian ReschkeAug 8, 2008 3:15 am 
Martin DuerstAug 22, 2008 2:02 am 
Yves LafonAug 27, 2008 2:43 am 
Martin DuerstAug 27, 2008 3:59 am 
Yves LafonAug 27, 2008 5:15 am 
Kris ZypAug 29, 2008 1:15 pm 
Julian ReschkeAug 31, 2008 4:39 am 
Kris ZypAug 31, 2008 6:32 am 
Julian ReschkeSep 1, 2008 1:21 am 
Jamie LokierSep 1, 2008 2:25 am 
Yves LafonSep 1, 2008 5:22 am 
Jamie LokierSep 1, 2008 7:11 am 
Kris ZypSep 1, 2008 7:22 am 
Kris ZypSep 1, 2008 7:24 am 
Jamie LokierSep 1, 2008 7:37 am 
Yves LafonSep 1, 2008 8:01 am 
Kris ZypSep 1, 2008 8:51 am 
Robert BrewerSep 1, 2008 11:13 am 
Kris ZypSep 1, 2008 12:41 pm 
Roy T. FieldingSep 1, 2008 6:25 pm 
Kris ZypSep 1, 2008 8:34 pm 
Jamie LokierSep 1, 2008 11:55 pm 
Henrik NordstromSep 2, 2008 5:01 am 
Kris ZypSep 2, 2008 7:34 am 
Kris ZypSep 2, 2008 7:37 am 
Henrik NordstromSep 2, 2008 12:43 pm 
Kris ZypSep 2, 2008 12:49 pm 
Jamie LokierSep 2, 2008 4:22 pm 
Jamie LokierSep 2, 2008 4:23 pm 
Kris ZypSep 2, 2008 4:43 pm 
Kris ZypSep 2, 2008 4:55 pm 
9 later messages
Subject:Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions
From:Kris Zyp (kr@sitepen.com)
Date:Aug 29, 2008 1:15:41 pm
List:org.w3.ietf-http-wg

I was referred to this discussion since it sounds like there consideration for
deprecating alternate range units. I just wanted to let the group know that Dojo
is currently using an range unit "items" for doing paged requests with it's JSON
REST client. The HTTP specification makes it sound like this is the most
appropriate technique for doing paged/range requests (and the byte unit will not
do, it would result in invalid JSON). I believe we are doing something similar
to what is mentioned in the referenced article:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc301869.aspx (we could change to
"rows" if desired).

When Dojo wants to have paged set of JSON objects (used in the Dojo Grid) it
will create a request like: GET /Customer/ Range: items=-19

And expects servers that are aware of the "items" range unit to respond with
something like: GET /Customer/ Content-Range: items 0-19/244 [{name:"item one"},{....

Thanks, Kris