| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Nottingham | Jul 28, 2008 5:58 am | |
| Frank Ellermann | Jul 28, 2008 7:11 am | |
| Mark Nottingham | Jul 28, 2008 7:54 am | |
| Frank Ellermann | Jul 28, 2008 11:05 am | |
| Mark Nottingham | Jul 28, 2008 3:14 pm | |
| Julian Reschke | Aug 5, 2008 9:21 am | |
| Brian Smith | Aug 5, 2008 9:50 am | |
| Yves Lafon | Aug 5, 2008 10:27 am | |
| Julian Reschke | Aug 5, 2008 11:06 am | |
| Jamie Lokier | Aug 5, 2008 11:29 am | |
| Yves Lafon | Aug 5, 2008 12:25 pm | |
| Lisa Dusseault | Aug 6, 2008 10:40 am | |
| Mark Nottingham | Aug 8, 2008 12:26 am | |
| Julian Reschke | Aug 8, 2008 1:10 am | |
| Larry Masinter | Aug 8, 2008 2:48 am | |
| Julian Reschke | Aug 8, 2008 3:15 am | |
| Martin Duerst | Aug 22, 2008 2:02 am | |
| Yves Lafon | Aug 27, 2008 2:43 am | |
| Martin Duerst | Aug 27, 2008 3:59 am | |
| Yves Lafon | Aug 27, 2008 5:15 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Aug 29, 2008 1:15 pm | |
| Julian Reschke | Aug 31, 2008 4:39 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Aug 31, 2008 6:32 am | |
| Julian Reschke | Sep 1, 2008 1:21 am | |
| Jamie Lokier | Sep 1, 2008 2:25 am | |
| Yves Lafon | Sep 1, 2008 5:22 am | |
| Jamie Lokier | Sep 1, 2008 7:11 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 1, 2008 7:22 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 1, 2008 7:24 am | |
| Jamie Lokier | Sep 1, 2008 7:37 am | |
| Yves Lafon | Sep 1, 2008 8:01 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 1, 2008 8:51 am | |
| Robert Brewer | Sep 1, 2008 11:13 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 1, 2008 12:41 pm | |
| Roy T. Fielding | Sep 1, 2008 6:25 pm | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 1, 2008 8:34 pm | |
| Jamie Lokier | Sep 1, 2008 11:55 pm | |
| Henrik Nordstrom | Sep 2, 2008 5:01 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 2, 2008 7:34 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 2, 2008 7:37 am | |
| Henrik Nordstrom | Sep 2, 2008 12:43 pm | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 2, 2008 12:49 pm | |
| Jamie Lokier | Sep 2, 2008 4:22 pm | |
| Jamie Lokier | Sep 2, 2008 4:23 pm | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 2, 2008 4:43 pm | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 2, 2008 4:55 pm | |
| Robert Brewer | Sep 3, 2008 1:46 pm | |
| Kris Zyp | Sep 3, 2008 2:07 pm | |
| Julian Reschke | Mar 30, 2009 7:46 am | |
| Julian Reschke | Mar 31, 2009 4:36 am | |
| Yves Lafon | Jul 28, 2009 2:17 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Nov 25, 2009 8:13 am | |
| Julian Reschke | Nov 25, 2009 8:21 am | |
| Kris Zyp | Nov 25, 2009 8:34 am | |
| Adrien de Croy | Nov 25, 2009 1:20 pm |
| Subject: | Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Kris Zyp (kr...@sitepen.com) | |
| Date: | Aug 29, 2008 1:15:41 pm | |
| List: | org.w3.ietf-http-wg | |
I was referred to this discussion since it sounds like there consideration for
deprecating alternate range units. I just wanted to let the group know that Dojo
is currently using an range unit "items" for doing paged requests with it's JSON
REST client. The HTTP specification makes it sound like this is the most
appropriate technique for doing paged/range requests (and the byte unit will not
do, it would result in invalid JSON). I believe we are doing something similar
to what is mentioned in the referenced article:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc301869.aspx (we could change to
"rows" if desired).
When Dojo wants to have paged set of JSON objects (used in the Dojo Grid) it
will create a request like:
GET /Customer/
Range: items=-19
And expects servers that are aware of the "items" range unit to respond with
something like:
GET /Customer/
Content-Range: items 0-19/244
[{name:"item one"},{....
Thanks, Kris





