atom feed3 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.xacmlRE: [xacml] [batch #2] counter propo...
FromSent OnAttachments
Beznosov, KonstantinApr 8, 2002 7:02 am 
bill parducciApr 8, 2002 7:38 am 
Beznosov, KonstantinApr 8, 2002 6:15 pm 
Subject:RE: [xacml] [batch #2] counter proposal to 3-04
From:bill parducci (bi@parducci.net)
Date:Apr 8, 2002 7:38:01 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.xacml

OCL is a great idea. good call.

b

On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 06:59, Beznosov, Konstantin wrote:

I tend to agree with Bill's point that the language should not be vendor-specific. This is especially important if we want this standard be ever supported across the industry.

However, I'm not sure how much we can leverage a specific programming language without getting trapped into the problem of providing compilable code. Isn't it better to use some formal, such as Z or OCL, language for such things? See http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~rej99/suprema/examples_main.htm for an example.