atom feed20 messages in net.java.dev.rococoa.usersRe: Rococoa Retain and Release
FromSent OnAttachments
Duncan McGregorJul 27, 2009 8:48 am 
Michael NagelJul 27, 2009 9:29 am 
Duncan McGregorJul 27, 2009 12:44 pm 
David KocherJul 27, 2009 3:35 pm 
Duncan McGregorJul 27, 2009 3:43 pm 
David KocherJul 27, 2009 4:08 pm 
Andrew ThompsonJul 27, 2009 7:02 pm 
Michael NagelJul 27, 2009 9:28 pm 
Duncan McGregorJul 28, 2009 1:29 am 
Duncan McGregorJul 28, 2009 3:42 am 
Duncan McGregorJul 28, 2009 4:07 am 
Duncan McGregorJul 28, 2009 4:33 am 
Andrew ThompsonJul 28, 2009 4:41 am 
Duncan McGregorJul 28, 2009 5:01 am 
Duncan McGregorJul 28, 2009 11:55 am 
Andrew ThompsonJul 28, 2009 6:17 pm 
Duncan McGregorAug 10, 2009 3:28 am 
Andrew ThompsonAug 10, 2009 8:56 pm 
Duncan McGregorSep 1, 2009 7:59 am 
Andrew ThompsonSep 1, 2009 6:12 pm 
Subject:Re: Rococoa Retain and Release
From:Andrew Thompson (lord@mac.com)
Date:Sep 1, 2009 6:12:48 pm
List:net.java.dev.rococoa.users

On Sep 1, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Duncan McGregor wrote:

This is theoretically true, but practically, you don't override release, you override dealloc. Then your code doesn't call dealloc explicitly, only as a result of release moving the count to 0.

Doh! Of course...

AndyT (lordpixel - the cat who walks through walls) A little bigger on the inside

(see you later space cowboy, you can't take the sky from me)