atom feed74 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersRe: kernfs/procfs questions...
FromSent OnAttachments
Mike SmithJun 1, 1998 4:41 pm 
Mike SmithJun 1, 1998 6:10 pm 
Mike SmithJun 1, 1998 6:57 pm 
John S. DysonJun 1, 1998 7:03 pm 
John S. DysonJun 1, 1998 7:25 pm 
John S. DysonJun 2, 1998 9:50 am 
Sean Eric FaganJun 2, 1998 10:57 am 
Mike SmithJun 2, 1998 1:06 pm 
Terry LambertJun 2, 1998 1:36 pm 
David GreenmanJun 2, 1998 4:07 pm 
David GreenmanJun 2, 1998 4:10 pm 
Jacques VidrineJun 2, 1998 4:24 pm 
Sean Eric FaganJun 2, 1998 5:19 pm 
David GreenmanJun 2, 1998 6:30 pm 
Sean Eric FaganJun 2, 1998 9:29 pm 
Peter DufaultJun 3, 1998 4:20 am 
Joao Carlos Mendes LuisJun 3, 1998 6:44 pm 
John S. DysonJun 3, 1998 9:40 pm 
Mike SmithJun 3, 1998 10:36 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 12:44 am 
Eivind EklundJun 4, 1998 4:40 am 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 9:50 am 
Terry LambertJun 4, 1998 10:49 am 
Terry LambertJun 4, 1998 11:08 am 
Mike SmithJun 4, 1998 11:19 am 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 11:48 am 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 12:10 pm 
Niall SmartJun 4, 1998 12:17 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 12:19 pm 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 12:27 pm 
Mark ShepardJun 4, 1998 12:48 pm 
Mike SmithJun 4, 1998 1:29 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 2:00 pm 
Mike SmithJun 4, 1998 2:05 pm 
Mike SmithJun 4, 1998 2:22 pm 
Mike SmithJun 4, 1998 2:40 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 2:57 pm 
Terry LambertJun 4, 1998 3:02 pm 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 3:22 pm 
Mike SmithJun 4, 1998 3:31 pm 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 3:32 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 3:34 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 3:43 pm 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 4:31 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 4:39 pm 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 4:49 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 4:56 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 5:01 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 5:05 pm 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 5:21 pm 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 5:23 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 5:43 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 5:44 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 5:46 pm 
M LyonsJun 4, 1998 6:08 pm 
David GreenmanJun 4, 1998 8:56 pm 
Nate WilliamsJun 4, 1998 10:10 pm 
Jason ThorpeJun 4, 1998 10:55 pm 
John S. DysonJun 4, 1998 11:53 pm 
David GreenmanJun 5, 1998 1:15 am 
Peter DufaultJun 5, 1998 4:15 am 
sbab...@dcn.att.comJun 5, 1998 7:02 am 
Allen SmithJun 5, 1998 9:27 am 
Wilko BulteJun 5, 1998 9:29 am 
John S. DysonJun 5, 1998 10:00 am 
Terry LambertJun 5, 1998 11:50 am 
Niall SmartJun 5, 1998 12:42 pm 
Terry LambertJun 5, 1998 1:29 pm 
Eivind EklundJun 6, 1998 7:20 am 
Terry LambertJun 6, 1998 11:53 am 
Eivind EklundJun 7, 1998 7:44 am 
Chuck RobeyJun 12, 1998 4:35 pm 
Mike SmithJun 12, 1998 5:07 pm 
Eivind EklundJun 12, 1998 6:07 pm 
Subject:Re: kernfs/procfs questions...
From:Nate Williams (na@mt.sri.com)
Date:Jun 4, 1998 4:31:56 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers

You aren't clear *which* sysctl should go away. If you mean sysctl(8), I hope you will be removing gdb, nm, hexdump, etc. as well, as these are all user-unfriendly tools designed for studying and/or adjusting the state of complex, undocumented things.

But users aren't expected to use gdb/nm/hexdump, but sysctl is. Many of these parameters *should* be tweaked to get better performance, avoid errors, etc...

Only some of them, if any.

Again I say, if they're not meant to be touched, then don't expose them. It's stupid to expose something that is useless for 99.9% of the population.

It's not my place to enforce, but if it were I'd start removing any sysctl's that weren't documented/used. As Mike pointed out in private email, there are 434 sysctl nodes in our system, and 20 of them are documented one way or the other. The rest are magic.

I think of sysctl as a bunch of big global variable, or OPTIONS in the kernel config file. If it isn't documented, it isn't needed.

Do I have permission to start removing sysctl's that aren't documented/used?

Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message