107 messages in org.apache.communityRe: Rules for Revolutionaries| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 04 Nov 2002 11:08 | |
| Vadim Gritsenko | 04 Nov 2002 12:47 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 04 Nov 2002 13:10 | |
| John Keyes | 04 Nov 2002 15:25 | |
| Sam Ruby | 04 Nov 2002 16:33 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 05 Nov 2002 17:37 | |
| Peter Donald | 05 Nov 2002 18:25 | |
| Costin Manolache | 05 Nov 2002 19:33 | |
| Aaron Bannert | 05 Nov 2002 21:27 | |
| Aaron Bannert | 05 Nov 2002 21:30 | |
| Ted Husted | 06 Nov 2002 05:15 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 06 Nov 2002 18:55 | |
| Daniel Rall | 06 Nov 2002 22:12 | |
| Sam Ruby | 07 Nov 2002 03:43 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 07 Nov 2002 04:11 | |
| Ted Husted | 07 Nov 2002 04:31 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 07 Nov 2002 05:33 | |
| Sam Ruby | 07 Nov 2002 08:01 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 07 Nov 2002 09:27 | |
| Costin Manolache | 07 Nov 2002 12:39 | |
| Rich Bowen | 08 Nov 2002 04:36 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 08 Nov 2002 09:06 | |
| Sam Ruby | 08 Nov 2002 13:50 | |
| Costin Manolache | 08 Nov 2002 14:05 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 08 Nov 2002 14:46 | |
| Costin Manolache | 08 Nov 2002 15:11 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 08 Nov 2002 15:48 | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | 08 Nov 2002 16:02 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 08 Nov 2002 16:57 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 08 Nov 2002 17:03 | |
| Martin van den Bemt | 08 Nov 2002 17:14 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 08 Nov 2002 17:48 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 08 Nov 2002 17:51 | |
| James Taylor | 08 Nov 2002 17:56 | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | 08 Nov 2002 17:58 | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | 08 Nov 2002 18:05 | |
| Sam Ruby | 08 Nov 2002 18:17 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 08 Nov 2002 18:38 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 08 Nov 2002 18:40 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 09 Nov 2002 00:29 | |
| Jeff Turner | 09 Nov 2002 02:44 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 03:27 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:13 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:25 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 09 Nov 2002 04:27 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:31 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:35 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 09 Nov 2002 04:36 | |
| Danny Angus | 09 Nov 2002 04:39 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:50 | |
| Martin van den Bemt | 09 Nov 2002 05:21 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 09 Nov 2002 06:28 | |
| Costin Manolache | 09 Nov 2002 08:50 | |
| Sam Ruby | 09 Nov 2002 09:29 | |
| Costin Manolache | 09 Nov 2002 10:23 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 09 Nov 2002 10:49 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 09 Nov 2002 10:58 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 12:33 | |
| James Duncan Davidson | 09 Nov 2002 15:29 | |
| James Duncan Davidson | 09 Nov 2002 15:37 | |
| Chuck Murcko | 09 Nov 2002 18:08 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 10 Nov 2002 05:29 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 10 Nov 2002 06:22 | |
| James Duncan Davidson | 10 Nov 2002 09:14 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 11 Nov 2002 19:05 | |
| Stephen McConnell | 11 Nov 2002 19:26 | |
| Sam Ruby | 11 Nov 2002 19:41 | |
| Jeff Turner | 11 Nov 2002 19:43 | |
| Stephen McConnell | 11 Nov 2002 19:43 | |
| Ovidiu Predescu | 11 Nov 2002 21:34 | |
| Ovidiu Predescu | 11 Nov 2002 21:36 | |
| Sam Ruby | 11 Nov 2002 21:51 | |
| Jeff Turner | 11 Nov 2002 23:18 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 12 Nov 2002 07:18 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 12 Nov 2002 07:25 | |
| Martin van den Bemt | 12 Nov 2002 08:19 | |
| Joe Schaefer | 12 Nov 2002 08:20 | |
| Jeff Turner | 12 Nov 2002 08:20 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 12 Nov 2002 08:28 | |
| Henri Yandell | 12 Nov 2002 08:41 | |
| Costin Manolache | 12 Nov 2002 09:58 | |
| Costin Manolache | 12 Nov 2002 10:14 | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | 12 Nov 2002 11:38 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 12 Nov 2002 12:18 | |
| Glenn Nielsen | 12 Nov 2002 19:05 | |
| Stephen McConnell | 13 Nov 2002 02:23 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 03:49 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 03:55 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 04:02 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 04:20 | |
| Stephen McConnell | 13 Nov 2002 04:21 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 13 Nov 2002 06:44 | |
| Joe Schaefer | 13 Nov 2002 07:38 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 08:50 | |
| Costin Manolache | 13 Nov 2002 10:01 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 10:16 | |
| Sam Ruby | 13 Nov 2002 11:16 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 13 Nov 2002 11:44 | |
| Costin Manolache | 13 Nov 2002 12:11 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 17:38 | |
| Roy T. Fielding | 14 Nov 2002 09:55 | |
| Daniel Rall | 15 Nov 2002 14:44 | |
| Sam Ruby | 15 Nov 2002 19:28 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 15 Nov 2002 20:10 | |
| Henri Gomez | 18 Nov 2002 09:57 | |
| Henri Gomez | 18 Nov 2002 10:01 | |
| Henri Gomez | 18 Nov 2002 23:26 |
| Subject: | Re: Rules for Revolutionaries![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Stefano Mazzocchi (stef...@apache.org) |
| Date: | 11/08/2002 03:48:39 PM |
| List: | org.apache.community |
Costin Manolache wrote:
In my personal opinion they are just redundant :-)
The rule that matter is that the community control the code and the name - a majority vote in the community can decide ultimately what happens.
Agreed. At the same time, I would love to see something written down about 'how the ASF guidelines are'. They might not be binding, just recommendations, but I think this will help a lot communities becaue these guidelines are distilled after years of try/fail cycles (and lot of pain!)
This is a particular case ( again IMO ) of the "releases are majority votes and can't be vetoed".
Definately agree.
A side effect of the 'revolution' rules is that a veto can be overriden - nobody can veto a revolution ( or a release ), and if you change the entire code base or a part of it you obviously can make changes that were vetoed.
Pier, Fede and I were talking about exactly this last night: I think the committer that proposes an internal fork looses the right to veto a release. Not to vote, but to veto. That's a very important distinction.
There are few important consequences:
1. No person ( or group ) can control a codebase by using veto. It is quite easy to find technical reasons against anything.
Agreed.
2. It removes some personal conflicts. A veto or someone blocking an idea can be painful. It's a big difference between a majority voting against a particular idea and one person vetoing it.
Same here.
3. To take tomcat as an example - it allows diverging groups or opinions to find the common ground. And that's the really great part IMO.
4. Some good ideas that may otherwise be rejected can eventually live.
perfectly agree with you 100%.
-- Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------




