chanwit wrote:
Hi John,
On 28/02/2008, tugwilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
The thing is we already have a very sophisticated JIT as part of the JVM.
It
will do a really excellent job if you let it. If you keep messing with
the
bytecodes you will not allow the JVM JIT to do its optimisation.
The trick of getting a fast dynamic runtime seems to be to do as little
optimisation as possible just have short simple execution paths and then
let
the JVM JIT do the work.
I cannot agree with you about this as someone at Sun is pushing MLVM.
This implies that they really know there is a room of improvement in
the current JVM ;-)
That somebody is John Rose. The groovy old timers know all about John Rose
:)
John Wilson
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/as-usual-on-performance---operations-on-primitives-tp15713441p15722775.html
Sent from the groovy - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
31 messages in org.codehaus.groovy.devRe: [groovy-dev] as usual on performa...
