atom feed34 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] here I go again..dynamic abs...
FromSent OnAttachments
Rory WalshFeb 5, 2009 9:46 am.pd
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 5, 2009 9:51 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 6, 2009 1:51 am 
Chris McCormickFeb 6, 2009 5:13 am 
Georg WernerFeb 6, 2009 2:07 pm 
Claude Heiland-AllenFeb 6, 2009 4:04 pm 
Georg WernerFeb 6, 2009 5:28 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 7, 2009 3:31 am 
Georg WernerFeb 8, 2009 6:13 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 9, 2009 12:47 am 
zmoe...@iem.atFeb 9, 2009 3:18 am 
Georg WernerFeb 9, 2009 4:33 am 
zmoe...@iem.atFeb 9, 2009 5:30 am 
Matt BarberFeb 9, 2009 12:00 pm 
Jonathan WilkesFeb 9, 2009 1:45 pm 
Jonathan WilkesFeb 9, 2009 2:17 pm 
Mike McGonagleFeb 9, 2009 2:43 pm 
Phil StoneFeb 9, 2009 3:50 pm 
Georg WernerFeb 9, 2009 3:52 pm 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 9, 2009 10:57 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 10, 2009 2:02 am 
zmoe...@iem.atFeb 10, 2009 3:50 am 
Phil StoneFeb 10, 2009 7:29 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 10, 2009 8:37 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 10, 2009 8:45 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 10, 2009 8:56 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 10, 2009 8:59 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 10, 2009 9:05 am 
JackFeb 10, 2009 9:18 am 
Chris McCormickFeb 10, 2009 9:20 am 
Phil StoneFeb 10, 2009 9:30 am 
Matt BarberFeb 10, 2009 9:36 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 10, 2009 9:50 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigFeb 10, 2009 10:22 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] here I go again..dynamic abstractions
From:Chris McCormick (chr@mccormick.cx)
Date:Feb 10, 2009 9:20:24 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:57:06AM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

But it does make a lot more sense if we don't think about how else it could have been and instead just accept it as it is...

the winter sunshine, cold hands connecting boxes; Pd crashed again.

[bang(/[until],

Chris.

------------------- http://mccormick.cx