| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Robbie Allen | Jun 27, 2008 5:22 pm | |
| Alexander Staubo | Jun 27, 2008 5:39 pm | |
| Robbie Allen | Jun 27, 2008 6:08 pm | |
| Rt Ibmer | Jun 27, 2008 6:54 pm | |
| mike | Jun 27, 2008 11:02 pm | |
| Grzegorz Nosek | Jun 28, 2008 4:50 am | |
| Grzegorz Nosek | Jun 28, 2008 5:31 am | |
| mike | Jun 28, 2008 9:14 am | |
| Alexander Staubo | Jun 28, 2008 12:28 pm | |
| Grzegorz Nosek | Jun 28, 2008 12:53 pm | |
| Almir Karic | Jun 28, 2008 1:30 pm | |
| Brice Figureau | Jun 28, 2008 2:36 pm | |
| Alexander Staubo | Jun 28, 2008 4:02 pm | |
| Rt Ibmer | Jun 28, 2008 9:38 pm | |
| Grzegorz Nosek | Jun 29, 2008 10:57 am | .patch, .patch, .patch |
| Brice Figureau | Jun 30, 2008 12:23 pm | |
| Grzegorz Nosek | Jun 30, 2008 12:49 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Is it possible to monitor the fair proxy balancer? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | mike (mike...@public.gmane.org) | |
| Date: | Jun 27, 2008 11:02:01 pm | |
| List: | ru.sysoev.nginx | |
To me, nginx just needs a simple API that could be worked with:
a) for reporting (I'd like to see bytes and requests per each Host: header) and for the below stuff...
b) for dynamic addition/removal of upstreams (external healthchecking scripts can tell nginx when to add/remove upstreams) - this seems to be coming up a lot too
On 6/27/08, Rt Ibmer <rtibmx-/E159...@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Guess I'll have to start looking at HAProxy, but I'd rather not.
nginx is a very stable, flexible and powerful server for sure. Hopefully you can
keep with it.
The issue of not having any direct stats/reporting about the upstream status
keeps coming up over and over. I think it is the only significant drawback and
would love to see it addressed. Unfortunately folks tend to post that the
monitoring is not the job of nginx. However I disagree - nginx is the one that
pulls and upstream out of rotation, and at a minimum it should at least have a
way to signal another process. It would be great to see this addressed once and
for all - hopefully one of these days it will get the priority and attention it
deserves IMO.






.patch, .patch, .patch