atom feed16 messages in org.gnome.foundation-listRe: time to (re)consider preferential...
FromSent OnAttachments
Luis VillaFeb 16, 2008 7:53 am 
Dave NearyFeb 16, 2008 8:19 am 
Jonathon JongsmaFeb 16, 2008 8:35 am 
Quim GilFeb 16, 2008 11:20 am 
Shaun McCanceFeb 16, 2008 3:47 pm 
Luis VillaFeb 17, 2008 5:32 am 
Quim GilFeb 17, 2008 11:36 am 
James HenstridgeFeb 23, 2008 5:32 pm 
Elijah NewrenFeb 23, 2008 8:10 pm 
Telsa GwynneFeb 24, 2008 12:41 am 
Shaun McCanceFeb 24, 2008 9:44 am 
James HenstridgeFeb 24, 2008 7:14 pm 
James HenstridgeFeb 25, 2008 5:08 am 
Behdad EsfahbodFeb 25, 2008 10:47 am 
Vincent UntzFeb 27, 2008 3:44 am 
Bruno BoaventuraFeb 27, 2008 2:23 pm 
Subject:Re: time to (re)consider preferential voting?
From:Dave Neary (bol@gnome.org)
Date:Feb 16, 2008 8:19:19 am
List:org.gnome.foundation-list

Hi,

Luis Villa wrote: I'm still trying to puzzle through the bylaws (which are a bit of a

mess wrt voting) as to what it would take to actually enact this change (bottom line is probably that the board can just say 'it should be this way'), but in the meantime I thought it might be good to have a bit of discussion here around whether or not this is a good idea.

I wholeheartedly support & encourage introducing preferential voting, whatever the method. I do feel that Schulze/Condorcet is overly complicated when compared with, say single-transferable votes, but any preferential method is good in my book.

Cheers, Dave.

-- Dave Neary GNOME Foundation member bol@gnome.org