10 messages in net.java.dev.woodstock.usersRe: Woodstock update
FromSent OnAttachments
John Jullion-CeccarelliNov 3, 2008 11:59 pm 
Felipe JaekelNov 4, 2008 6:57 am 
Jaider Fernando RodriguezNov 5, 2008 5:37 pm 
autozoomNov 6, 2008 12:52 am 
Paolo ProniNov 6, 2008 12:59 am 
autozoomNov 6, 2008 6:05 am 
Paolo ProniNov 6, 2008 6:31 am 
Felipe JaekelNov 6, 2008 3:07 pm 
Federico Vela [PaySett Corp]Nov 10, 2008 7:28 am 
JokersAug 12, 2009 11:48 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Woodstock updateActions...
From:Paolo Proni (ppr@elettronicagf.it)
Date:Nov 6, 2008 6:31:41 am
List:net.java.dev.woodstock.users

I totally agree with you. In fact now I am evaluating JBoss Developer.

I am converting my existing application to RichFaces, still using NetBeans, as I am already used to that IDE and changing is not so inviting, but I have not the visual approach anymore.

Please, Sun, at least let us use RichFaces visually on NetBeans in a decent way! I tried IceFaces with NetBeans but I did not like how it worked... I like(d) NetBeans for the visual support to Woodstock. But that's history. Paolo

yes we can and maybe we'll be forced to, but what about the visual approach to developing web inteface? It is (was...) the real point of strength of Woodstock components and Netbeans I think

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user@woodstock.dev.java.net For additional commands, e-mail: user@woodstock.dev.java.net