10 messages in edu.cmu.andrew.lists.info-cyrusencoded packet size too big
FromSent OnAttachments
Jukka SalmiJul 1, 2004 5:32 pm 
Jukka SalmiJul 5, 2004 9:58 am 
Jukka SalmiJul 6, 2004 2:20 pm 
AndreasJul 6, 2004 3:19 pm 
Rob SiemborskiJul 6, 2004 5:01 pm 
Rob SiemborskiJul 6, 2004 5:57 pm 
Jukka SalmiJul 7, 2004 6:46 am 
KevinOct 30, 2004 9:27 am 
AndreasNov 1, 2004 7:55 am 
AndreasNov 1, 2004 7:56 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:encoded packet size too bigActions
From:Kevin (cyr@gnosys.biz)
Date:Oct 30, 2004 9:27:51 am
List:edu.cmu.andrew.lists.info-cyrus

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 12:46 +0200, Jukka Salmi wrote:

Rob Siemborski --> cyrus-sasl (2004-07-06 17:57:23 -0400):

After talking with Sam Hartman, it became apparent that MIT gets the implementation of gss_wrap_size_limit right and Heimdal gets it oh...so...wrong.

I've committed a patch that should make this work in both cases, however.

I'm using Heimdal and the patch seems to work fine, at least it solved my original problem. Thanks a lot!

Hi List-

I just found this thread in the archive because I'm seeing the same problem ("encoded packet size too big").

I'm using MIT Kerberos 5 version 1.3.1 (I know that's a bit out of date, but it's a non-production environment), Cyrus SASL 2.1.19 and Cyrus IMAPd 2.2.7. My gssapi.c file in the sasl package is version 1.90. From the file head:

1 /* GSSAPI SASL plugin 2 * Leif Johansson 3 * Rob Siemborski (SASL v2 Conversion) 4 * $Id: gssapi.c,v 1.90 2004/07/06 21:55:47 rjs3 Exp $

I'm guessing that the patch mentioned at the top of this thread is already in this file (I don't see anything in my file remotely resembling what I see in bugzilla line 1419), as well as the one that apparently caused the broken behavior again, but Jukka Salmi reports his problem is solved (he's using Heimdal), but I still see this problem.

Any advice? Should I upgrade MIT Kerberos or will that even have any effect on this?

TIA.