atom feed17 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stableRe: fstab mount options
FromSent OnAttachments
Harry PutnamJul 3, 2000 2:10 pm 
Vivek KheraJul 3, 2000 2:22 pm 
Crist J. ClarkJul 3, 2000 2:34 pm 
Brad KnowlesJul 3, 2000 3:07 pm 
Udo ErdelhoffJul 3, 2000 3:13 pm 
Crist J. ClarkJul 3, 2000 4:30 pm 
Harry PutnamJul 3, 2000 4:40 pm 
Brad KnowlesJul 4, 2000 12:54 am 
David MaloneJul 4, 2000 2:02 am 
David MaloneJul 4, 2000 2:08 am 
AMAKAWA ShuheiJul 4, 2000 2:12 am 
Jonathan SmithJul 4, 2000 6:31 am 
Peter RadcliffeJul 4, 2000 11:14 am 
Jonathan MichaelsJul 4, 2000 4:10 pm 
Vivek KheraJul 5, 2000 7:05 am 
Vivek KheraJul 5, 2000 7:12 am 
David O'BrienJul 6, 2000 1:56 pm 
Subject:Re: fstab mount options
From:Brad Knowles (bl@skynet.be)
Date:Jul 4, 2000 12:54:10 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

At 4:30 PM -0700 2000/7/3, Crist J. Clark wrote:

From the comment, I would say he has a SCSI Zip drive. The same line could apply to Jaz, an ancient Bernoull, or the like.

The risk I see is does this method let users mount with setuid?

Right, but if he had any other SCSI disks on the system (such as the disk with /, /usr, /var, etc...), wouldn't this also allow them to be mounted & unmounted as desired by the user?

Certainly if you're talking about your own laptop or dedicated desktop machine, the rules can be relaxed somewhat. However, in general this just seems to be a particularly unsafe practice. That is, unless I've missed something fundamental?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message