67 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] CVs| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Josh Moore | May 7, 2011 3:31 pm | |
| Patrice Colet | May 8, 2011 1:52 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 8, 2011 7:46 am | |
| Martin Peach | May 8, 2011 8:48 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 8, 2011 4:51 pm | |
| Billy Stiltner | May 9, 2011 4:07 am | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 9, 2011 4:53 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 9, 2011 6:21 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 9, 2011 6:43 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 9, 2011 2:06 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 10, 2011 9:11 am | |
| Jaime Oliver | May 10, 2011 10:00 am | |
| Billy Stiltner | May 10, 2011 10:01 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 10, 2011 11:57 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 10, 2011 5:16 pm | |
| Patrice Colet | May 10, 2011 6:43 pm | |
| Simon Wise | May 11, 2011 1:19 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 11, 2011 1:23 am | |
| hard off | May 11, 2011 6:27 am | |
| Pedro Lopes | May 11, 2011 6:48 am | |
| hard off | May 11, 2011 6:55 am | |
| hard off | May 11, 2011 6:57 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 11, 2011 7:15 am | |
| Derek Holzer | May 11, 2011 9:58 am | |
| hard off | May 11, 2011 10:04 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 13, 2011 9:38 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 18, 2011 9:57 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | May 18, 2011 9:59 pm | |
| batinste | May 19, 2011 1:17 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 19, 2011 5:01 am | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 19, 2011 8:11 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 19, 2011 10:01 pm | |
| Simon Wise | May 20, 2011 7:04 am | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 21, 2011 3:21 pm | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 21, 2011 3:22 pm | |
| Simon Wise | May 22, 2011 1:28 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 22, 2011 10:36 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 22, 2011 11:00 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 22, 2011 6:03 pm | |
| Patrice Colet | May 22, 2011 8:09 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | May 22, 2011 9:21 pm | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 23, 2011 12:21 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 23, 2011 4:53 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 23, 2011 5:01 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 23, 2011 5:46 am | |
| Patrice Colet | May 23, 2011 6:20 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 23, 2011 9:09 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 23, 2011 9:37 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 24, 2011 7:29 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 24, 2011 9:13 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 26, 2011 5:57 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 26, 2011 6:14 am | |
| tim vets | May 26, 2011 12:11 pm | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 27, 2011 12:57 am | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 27, 2011 1:08 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 27, 2011 1:24 am | |
| hard off | May 27, 2011 1:51 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 27, 2011 7:03 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 28, 2011 11:08 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jun 2, 2011 10:45 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jun 2, 2011 2:33 pm | |
| Andy Farnell | Jun 20, 2011 10:03 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jun 20, 2011 6:14 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | Jun 20, 2011 6:51 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | Jun 20, 2011 6:54 pm | |
| Andy Farnell | Jun 21, 2011 12:22 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 7, 2011 12:39 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] CVs | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Patrice Colet (cole...@free.fr) | |
| Date: | May 23, 2011 6:20:51 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
In fact I'm wondering if pegasus was a representation of something well known in the past europe, like thunder, in some other cultures thunder was certainly represented by dragons. Human brain could have developped a language by using fictional animals to describe physical phenomenons, and this language would have been re-interpreted to something else by the immixtion of different cultures. Two snakes wrapped around a tree could have been how people represented double layer structure in a plasma.
Fiction might refer to a reality becoming slightly different each time it passes through the synaptic network of human brain, mostly when parameters are missing for doing the computation. That might be how we come to weird things like dark matter, when ignoring electrical interaction at a galaxy scale well explained by Hannes Alfvén, when he compare a galaxy with homopolar motors.
----- "Bryan Jurish" <jur...@uni-potsdam.de> a écrit :
moin Patrice,
On 2011-05-23 05:09, Patrice Colet wrote:
We can imagine many different kinds of new animals, some also have been modelized since a long time through sculptures, we know that almost all those weird animals are not and have never
been real.
To pick a much-overused example, is the sentence "Pegasus is a flying horse" true or false? Or do we need to ditch the principle of bivalence? What the heck does "Pegasus" refer to anyways? Clearly, we can all parse the sentence and assign it some kind of semantic interpretation, and no one here is claiming to have actually perceived any airborne equines recently, but I think there's more going on here than can be adequately described by "so-and-so-many synapses in these-and-those brains dumped so-and-so-many neurotransmitters of such-and-such a chemical composition into their respective synaptic gaps in response to an influx of such-and-such a mean volume of sodium ions"... to put it bluntly, how `real' is fiction? Maybe that's what you were getting at in the first place; apologies if I'm beating a dead horse, airborne or otherwise ;-)
marmosets, Bryan
-- Bryan Jurish "There is *always* one more bug." jur...@uni-potsdam.de -Lubarsky's Law of Cybernetic Entomology
-- Patrice Colet
_______________________________________________
Pd-l...@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list