3 messages in com.googlegroups.bloggerdevRe: [bloggerDev] documentation licens...| Subject: | Re: [bloggerDev] documentation license and templating version |
|---|---|
| From: | Eric Case (c....@google.com) |
| Date: | 11/23/2005 02:50:45 PM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.bloggerdev |
Hi Josh,
Just wanted to send an update on this - we recently added a Creative Commons license to all the docs in this section:
http://help.blogger.com/bin/topic.py?topic=39
Cheers, E
On 8/4/05, Eric Case <c....@google.com> wrote:
Hi Josh,
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this - we're hammering out some sort of licensing agreement for Blogger's Help docs so that this'll be more clearly defined in the future.
In the meantime, feel free to do this but definitely link back to the original documentation and mention that it's from Blogger Help.
Regarding template versioning, going by date should be sufficient.
Thanks, E
On 6/20/05, endquote <jo....@endquote.com> wrote:
I am working on an extension to an HTML editing program to add code-hinting and syntax checking support for developers of Blogger templates. I would like to copy some of the documentation of the tags from the Help section of the Blogger site, but am wondering what licensing issues I might run into.
This wouldn't be a major thing, just including things like...
<$BlogPageTitle$> - Gives your published blog pages smart titles ("Blog Name" for the index page, "Blog Name: Date Info" for archive pages, and "Blog Name: Post Title" for Post Pages). This tag should only be used in a Template's <head>, in between <title> and </title>.
...in my docs. I am guessing that this would not be a problem, but I'd like to do a little butt-covering.
I also want to note in my extension that it supports "Blogger template version 1.0", or "Blogger templates as of June 20, 2005", or something to that effect. What is the correct way to refer to the current version of the Blogger templating engine?
thanks, -josh