atom feed24 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archMPSAFE TTY schedule [uart vs sio]
FromSent OnAttachments
Ed SchoutenJul 2, 2008 7:08 pm 
Takahashi YoshihiroJul 3, 2008 1:49 pm 
Ed SchoutenJul 3, 2008 8:52 pm 
Sam LefflerJul 3, 2008 9:41 pm 
Marcel MoolenaarJul 4, 2008 1:49 am 
Peter JeremyJul 4, 2008 2:21 am 
Ed SchoutenJul 4, 2008 9:22 am 
Peter WemmJul 4, 2008 9:41 am 
M. Warner LoshJul 4, 2008 12:32 pm 
M. Warner LoshJul 4, 2008 12:36 pm 
M. Warner LoshJul 4, 2008 12:36 pm 
Takahashi YoshihiroJul 4, 2008 1:12 pm 
Coleman KaneJul 4, 2008 2:57 pm 
Marcel MoolenaarJul 4, 2008 7:42 pm 
Marcel MoolenaarJul 4, 2008 7:50 pm 
Takahashi YoshihiroJul 5, 2008 12:25 pm 
Marcel MoolenaarJul 5, 2008 4:04 pm 
Bruce EvansJul 6, 2008 3:04 pm 
Peter JeremyJul 7, 2008 8:43 am 
Ed SchoutenJul 8, 2008 2:16 pm 
Ed SchoutenJul 13, 2008 7:22 am 
Ed SchoutenJul 20, 2008 12:34 pm 
Giorgos KeramidasJul 20, 2008 6:46 pm 
Ed SchoutenAug 8, 2008 3:55 am 
Subject:MPSAFE TTY schedule [uart vs sio]
From:Takahashi Yoshihiro (ny@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Date:Jul 4, 2008 1:12:36 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

In article <2008@bsdimp.com> "M. Warner Losh" <im@bsdimp.com> writes:

Do you need physical access? I have a pc98 machine I can put back on the network. It has the 8251 chip in it. It also has a 16550 part as well since it is a later model which had both...

I believe that uart works for the 16550 part, but haven't tried it lately...

The uart probably works for some 16550 based devices but does not work for other one like multi-port devices.