107 messages in org.apache.communityRe: Rules for Revolutionaries| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| 38 earlier messages | ||
| Andrew C. Oliver | 08 Nov 2002 18:40 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 09 Nov 2002 00:29 | |
| Jeff Turner | 09 Nov 2002 02:44 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 03:26 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:13 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:25 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 09 Nov 2002 04:27 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:31 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:35 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 09 Nov 2002 04:36 | |
| Danny Angus | 09 Nov 2002 04:39 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 04:50 | |
| Martin van den Bemt | 09 Nov 2002 05:21 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 09 Nov 2002 06:28 | |
| Costin Manolache | 09 Nov 2002 08:49 | |
| Sam Ruby | 09 Nov 2002 09:29 | |
| Costin Manolache | 09 Nov 2002 10:23 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 09 Nov 2002 10:49 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 09 Nov 2002 10:58 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 09 Nov 2002 12:32 | |
| James Duncan Davidson | 09 Nov 2002 15:29 | |
| James Duncan Davidson | 09 Nov 2002 15:37 | |
| Chuck Murcko | 09 Nov 2002 18:07 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 10 Nov 2002 05:29 | |
| Ceki Gülcü | 10 Nov 2002 06:21 | |
| James Duncan Davidson | 10 Nov 2002 09:14 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 11 Nov 2002 19:05 | |
| Stephen McConnell | 11 Nov 2002 19:26 | |
| Sam Ruby | 11 Nov 2002 19:41 | |
| Jeff Turner | 11 Nov 2002 19:42 | |
| Stephen McConnell | 11 Nov 2002 19:43 | |
| Ovidiu Predescu | 11 Nov 2002 21:34 | |
| Ovidiu Predescu | 11 Nov 2002 21:35 | |
| Sam Ruby | 11 Nov 2002 21:50 | |
| Jeff Turner | 11 Nov 2002 23:17 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 12 Nov 2002 07:18 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 12 Nov 2002 07:24 | |
| Martin van den Bemt | 12 Nov 2002 08:18 | |
| Joe Schaefer | 12 Nov 2002 08:19 | |
| Jeff Turner | 12 Nov 2002 08:20 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 12 Nov 2002 08:28 | |
| Henri Yandell | 12 Nov 2002 08:41 | |
| Costin Manolache | 12 Nov 2002 09:57 | |
| Costin Manolache | 12 Nov 2002 10:14 | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | 12 Nov 2002 11:38 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 12 Nov 2002 12:18 | |
| Glenn Nielsen | 12 Nov 2002 19:04 | |
| Stephen McConnell | 13 Nov 2002 02:23 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 03:49 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 03:55 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 04:02 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 04:20 | |
| Stephen McConnell | 13 Nov 2002 04:20 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 13 Nov 2002 06:44 | |
| Joe Schaefer | 13 Nov 2002 07:37 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 08:49 | |
| Costin Manolache | 13 Nov 2002 10:01 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 10:15 | |
| Sam Ruby | 13 Nov 2002 11:16 | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | 13 Nov 2002 11:44 | |
| Costin Manolache | 13 Nov 2002 12:10 | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | 13 Nov 2002 17:37 | |
| Roy T. Fielding | 14 Nov 2002 09:54 | |
| Daniel Rall | 15 Nov 2002 14:44 | |
| Sam Ruby | 15 Nov 2002 19:28 | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | 15 Nov 2002 20:09 | |
| Henri Gomez | 18 Nov 2002 09:56 | |
| Henri Gomez | 18 Nov 2002 10:00 | |
| Henri Gomez | 18 Nov 2002 23:26 | |
| Subject: | Re: Rules for Revolutionaries![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Rodent of Unusual Size (Ken....@Golux.Com) |
| Date: | 11/13/2002 03:55:17 AM |
| List: | org.apache.community |
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org> writes:
I believe it was a mistake to allow two different codebases to share the same name.
I'm not convinced that "having two codebases" is necessarily a mistake.
it's not the multiple codebases that's the issue; it's that they both had the same name and both continued active development.
as a counterexample, both httpd 1.3 and 2.0 were in concurrent active development for a long time. 1.3 development slowed down, and when 2.0 was finally released, 1.3 went into a sort of maintenance mode -- meaning that bugfixes and minor backported features can show up in it, but nothing that doesn't also appear in 2.0 at the same time.
i'm not familiar with the data around the tomcat issue, just the metadata, but i'm getting the feeling that major divergent feature enhancement was occurring in both branches. (e.g., something might be added to tomcat 3 that wasn't (and won't be) in tomcat 4). is that correct, or a misunderstanding on my part?




