I support proceeding with this. I would like to contribute the following
"Support for UN/CEFACT Core Components"
+1 on requirements for eGov Registry and Repository
+1 on adding support for UN/CEFACT Core Components
eGov TC can be a really effective and exciting arena for establishing
how UBL schemas can be based upon contextualized Core Components BIEs
managed in a registry/repository. I would be interested in contributing
to such an effort as well.
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
Duane Nickull wrote:
I would like to start collecting requirements from eGovernment contacts
for what they would like to see from a Registry/Repository system. This
would be done as a deliverable of the infrastructure sub-group and I am
volunteering to lead this tp get it started. The reason I would like to
proceed is that there is currently a lot of activity within governments
on a global basis with respect to RegRep.
Does anybody have any thoughts on this or reasons why we should not proceed?