atom feed28 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.egovRe: [egov] UN XML project gains Micro...
FromSent OnAttachments
David RR Webber - XML ebusinessMay 17, 2003 7:22 am 
Paul SpencerMay 19, 2003 1:41 am 
Farrukh NajmiMay 19, 2003 8:34 am 
David RR Webber - XML ebusinessMay 19, 2003 8:46 am 
David RR Webber - XML ebusinessMay 19, 2003 9:14 am 
Chiusano JosephMay 19, 2003 9:32 am 
Paul SpencerMay 19, 2003 10:43 am 
Duane NickullMay 19, 2003 12:50 pm 
Chiusano JosephMay 19, 2003 3:48 pm 
Duane NickullMay 20, 2003 9:16 am 
Chiusano JosephMay 20, 2003 10:17 am 
Farrukh NajmiMay 20, 2003 10:46 am 
Chiusano JosephMay 20, 2003 10:51 am 
David RR Webber - XML ebusinessMay 20, 2003 12:04 pm 
Duane NickullMay 20, 2003 12:11 pm 
David RR Webber - XML ebusinessMay 20, 2003 8:07 pm 
Monica J. MartinMay 20, 2003 8:43 pm 
Duane NickullMay 20, 2003 9:33 pm 
Duane NickullMay 20, 2003 9:37 pm 
Farrukh NajmiMay 21, 2003 3:14 am 
Monica J. MartinMay 21, 2003 6:14 am 
David RR Webber - XML ebusinessMay 21, 2003 6:15 am 
David RR Webber - XML ebusinessMay 21, 2003 6:26 am 
Duane NickullMay 21, 2003 10:46 am 
Zachary AlexanderMay 21, 2003 12:55 pm 
Duane NickullMay 21, 2003 1:24 pm 
David RR Webber - XML ebusinessMay 21, 2003 8:52 pm 
Monica J. MartinMay 22, 2003 9:06 pm 
Subject:Re: [egov] UN XML project gains Microsoft support
From:Farrukh Najmi (farr@sun.com)
Date:May 20, 2003 10:46:04 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.egov

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

I support proceeding with this. I would like to contribute the following requirement:

"Support for UN/CEFACT Core Components"

+1 on requirements for eGov Registry and Repository +1 on adding support for UN/CEFACT Core Components

eGov TC can be a really effective and exciting arena for establishing how UBL schemas can be based upon contextualized Core Components BIEs managed in a registry/repository. I would be interested in contributing to such an effort as well.

--Farrukh

Kind Regards, Joe Chiusano Booz | Allen | Hamilton

Hello all:

I would like to start collecting requirements from eGovernment contacts for what they would like to see from a Registry/Repository system. This would be done as a deliverable of the infrastructure sub-group and I am volunteering to lead this tp get it started. The reason I would like to proceed is that there is currently a lot of activity within governments on a global basis with respect to RegRep.

Does anybody have any thoughts on this or reasons why we should not proceed?