atom feed46 messages in com.mulberrytech.lists.xsl-listRe: [xsl] current-dateTime()
FromSent OnAttachments
Andrew WelchApr 18, 2008 4:53 am 
David CarlisleApr 18, 2008 5:06 am 
John SnelsonApr 18, 2008 5:12 am 
Mukul GandhiApr 18, 2008 5:48 am 
Dimitre NovatchevApr 18, 2008 5:54 am 
Mukul GandhiApr 18, 2008 5:56 am 
Robert KobergApr 18, 2008 6:03 am 
Andrew WelchApr 18, 2008 6:05 am 
David CarlisleApr 18, 2008 6:19 am 
Colin Paul AdamsApr 18, 2008 6:35 am 
Michael LudwigApr 18, 2008 7:11 am 
Liam QuinApr 18, 2008 7:24 am 
Liam QuinApr 18, 2008 7:33 am 
Robert KobergApr 18, 2008 7:34 am 
Colin Paul AdamsApr 18, 2008 7:38 am 
Abel BraaksmaApr 18, 2008 7:38 am 
Colin Paul AdamsApr 18, 2008 7:45 am 
Michael LudwigApr 18, 2008 7:46 am 
Abel BraaksmaApr 18, 2008 7:47 am 
Andrew WelchApr 18, 2008 7:48 am 
Abel BraaksmaApr 18, 2008 7:50 am 
Abel BraaksmaApr 18, 2008 7:54 am 
Abel BraaksmaApr 18, 2008 7:56 am 
Dimitre NovatchevApr 18, 2008 7:57 am 
Abel BraaksmaApr 18, 2008 7:58 am 
Colin Paul AdamsApr 18, 2008 8:03 am 
Dimitre NovatchevApr 18, 2008 8:04 am 
Andrew WelchApr 18, 2008 8:07 am 
Dimitre NovatchevApr 18, 2008 8:16 am 
Andrew WelchApr 18, 2008 8:19 am 
Andrew WelchApr 18, 2008 8:38 am 
Michael LudwigApr 18, 2008 8:45 am 
Dimitre NovatchevApr 18, 2008 9:01 am 
Abel BraaksmaApr 18, 2008 9:29 am 
Robert KobergApr 18, 2008 2:20 pm 
Liam QuinApr 18, 2008 6:42 pm 
Liam QuinApr 18, 2008 6:44 pm 
Dimitre NovatchevApr 18, 2008 7:30 pm 
Michael KayApr 19, 2008 12:27 am 
Michael KayApr 19, 2008 12:37 am 
Mukul GandhiApr 19, 2008 12:38 am 
Michael KayApr 19, 2008 1:51 am 
Michael LudwigApr 19, 2008 2:20 am 
Andrew WelchApr 19, 2008 2:39 am 
Mukul GandhiApr 19, 2008 8:24 am 
Dimitre NovatchevApr 19, 2008 9:11 am 
Subject:Re: [xsl] current-dateTime()
From:Dimitre Novatchev (dnov@gmail.com)
Date:Apr 18, 2008 7:30:27 pm
List:com.mulberrytech.lists.xsl-list

Yes, in that case you can get the function called. Once you venture into the land of extensions, anything becomes possible :-)

And you probably noticed from my other posts in this thread some guaranteed ways to sequence the XSLT transformation process without the need to use any extension functions at all :o)

-- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Liam Quin <li@w3.org> wrote:

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:04:45AM -0700, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:

Just use an extension function with an argument that it ignores (but the XSLT processor has no way of knowing this) and call it every time with different argument value, for example:

for $i in 1 to 1000000 return (ext:myTime($i), f:doSomething())

Yes, in that case you can get the function called. Once you venture into the land of extensions, anything becomes possible :-)

It was not the point I was trying to make, but maybe it is not important.

Liam

-- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/

--~------------------------------------------------------------------

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/ or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-@lists.mulberrytech.com> --~--

--~------------------------------------------------------------------ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/ or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-@lists.mulberrytech.com> --~--