15 messages in net.java.dev.openjfx-compiler.devRe: accessibility proposal
FromSent OnAttachments
Per BothnerJun 16, 2008 4:21 pm 
Robert FieldJun 16, 2008 9:48 pm 
Joshua SmithJun 16, 2008 10:24 pm 
Rémi ForaxJun 17, 2008 12:57 am 
Ethan NicholasJun 18, 2008 6:40 am 
Brian GoetzJun 18, 2008 7:37 am 
Shannon HickeyJun 18, 2008 7:44 am 
Brian GoetzJun 18, 2008 8:05 am 
Robert FieldJun 18, 2008 9:32 am 
Per BothnerJun 18, 2008 12:16 pm 
Dean IversonJun 18, 2008 12:51 pm 
Brian GoetzJun 18, 2008 12:56 pm 
Dean IversonJun 18, 2008 1:22 pm 
Brian GoetzJun 18, 2008 1:26 pm 
Christopher OliverJun 18, 2008 2:09 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: accessibility proposalActions...
From:Brian Goetz (Bria@Sun.COM)
Date:Jun 18, 2008 8:05:08 am
List:net.java.dev.openjfx-compiler.dev

The ways in which these proposals differ is in subtle ways. In fact, I'll bet that many java developers would be surprised to learn what "protected" really means in Java.

Are you going to tell us? :)

As evidence that the actual rules are too complicated, neither I, nor Per, nor Robert got them all right without looking in the JLS. And we're reasonably experienced Java programmers :)

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-@openjfx-compiler.dev.java.net For additional commands, e-mail: dev-@openjfx-compiler.dev.java.net