14 messages in org.apache.legal-discussRe: Maven repository issues [Was: Cre...
FromSent OnAttachments
Henri YandellMay 29, 2008 1:06 am 
Stefano BagnaraMay 29, 2008 1:17 am 
Assaf ArkinMay 29, 2008 10:53 am 
Henri YandellMay 29, 2008 12:10 pm 
Stefano BagnaraMay 29, 2008 12:35 pm 
David JencksMay 29, 2008 12:47 pm 
Craig L RussellMay 29, 2008 2:38 pm 
Gilles ScokartMay 30, 2008 1:04 am 
Stefano BagnaraMay 30, 2008 1:47 am 
Assaf ArkinMay 30, 2008 2:50 am 
sebbMay 30, 2008 2:51 am 
Stefano BagnaraMay 30, 2008 3:33 am 
Assaf ArkinMay 30, 2008 4:33 am 
Gilles ScokartMay 30, 2008 4:35 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Maven repository issues [Was: Creative Commons Attribution License]Actions...
From:Gilles Scokart (gsco@gmail.com)
Date:May 30, 2008 1:04:10 am
List:org.apache.legal-discuss

2008/5/29 Assaf Arkin <ark@intalio.com>:

Except, not everything is copyrightable, it has to have some creativity in it.

This particular case is not copyrightable, and slapping a copyright statement on it won't change that.

I can't disagree more. Writing a pom requires a lot of creativity. You have to carrefully choose the libraries with sometimes multiple possibilities, you need to choose the right versions, you have to put a scope on each one, you have to choose which one you want to inherit transitevely and which one you want to specify at first level dependencies, you will have to choose if you want to use a dependencyManagment block or not, if you want to use a prent pom or not, and I didn't talked about the profiles...

Why do you think that there is so many bad designed pom on the maven repositories ? It simply because to write a good pom you must be an artist ;-) !

Anyway, it requires creativity. For quiet a lot of project, 2 persons would probably produce 2 different pom.