atom feed18 messages in net.java.dev.phoneme.advancedRe: CVMstoreImpl assembly code
FromSent OnAttachments
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgJul 26, 2007 11:09 pm 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgJul 27, 2007 7:23 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 18, 2008 7:45 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 18, 2008 9:55 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 22, 2008 10:15 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 23, 2008 9:28 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 23, 2008 11:33 pm 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 23, 2008 11:35 pm 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 24, 2008 8:22 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 24, 2008 8:27 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 24, 2008 10:53 pm 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 26, 2008 11:12 pm 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgApr 28, 2008 12:21 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgMay 5, 2008 4:36 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgMay 5, 2008 4:41 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgMay 5, 2008 2:22 pm 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgMay 9, 2008 3:45 am 
phon...@mobileandembedded.orgMay 9, 2008 8:21 am 
Subject:Re: CVMstoreImpl assembly code
From:phon...@mobileandembedded.org (phon@mobileandembedded.org)
Date:Apr 24, 2008 8:22:14 am
List:net.java.dev.phoneme.advanced

Locks that are re-entered by the same thread should be faster with atomicops
than without. Are you sure the example is as simple as the one you gave, and
there isn't, for example, another thread also contending for the lock?

Chris [Message sent by forum member 'cjplummer' (cjplummer)]

http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=271029