The use case comes from working with jackrabbit.
we have a business facade in front of jackrabbit and
there is a method to receive a file node by its uuid and
one to search within jackrabbit.
we store the uuids in our application and colleague at work
had more files to receive and he wants not to call the method to receive the
file node for every uuid
so he tries to search with a contains for the uuid's, and from that comes the
question.
a fulltext search for uuid's is absolutly no must for us and we also changed the
method to
get file nodes for more uuids ...
i only want to know why it does not work as jukka find in the code ?
BR
claus
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: unc...@day.com [mailto:unc...@day.com] Im Auftrag von David Nuescheler
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 11:04
An: use...@jackrabbit.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: another search question ...
Out of curiosity: why would you *ever* want that?
I can only second that...
I could never imagine that someone would fulltext search UUID's.
The "OR" case can also easily be handled by SQL or most efficiently by
subsequent calls to getByUUID.
Can you elaborate on the use case?
regards,
david
14 messages in org.apache.jackrabbit.usersAW: AW: another search question ...
