| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 6:21 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 7:13 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 7:22 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 7:59 am | |
| Giovanni Tummarello | Nov 4, 2010 8:20 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 8:22 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 8:27 am | |
| Leigh Dodds | Nov 4, 2010 8:38 am | |
| William Waites | Nov 4, 2010 8:43 am | |
| Giovanni Tummarello | Nov 4, 2010 8:50 am | |
| Leigh Dodds | Nov 4, 2010 8:53 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 8:55 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 8:57 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 9:06 am | |
| Bradley Allen | Nov 4, 2010 9:06 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 9:10 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 9:13 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 9:16 am | |
| bill...@planet.nl | Nov 4, 2010 9:20 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 9:22 am | |
| Bradley Allen | Nov 4, 2010 9:25 am | |
| Harry Halpin | Nov 4, 2010 9:33 am | |
| Robin YANG | Nov 4, 2010 9:51 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 9:54 am | |
| David Wood | Nov 4, 2010 9:56 am | |
| Mike Kelly | Nov 4, 2010 10:12 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 10:13 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Nov 4, 2010 10:17 am | |
| David Wood | Nov 4, 2010 10:24 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Nov 4, 2010 10:36 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 4, 2010 10:51 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 11:06 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 4, 2010 11:07 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Nov 4, 2010 11:08 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 11:18 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 11:24 am | |
| Robert Fuller | Nov 4, 2010 11:38 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 4, 2010 11:38 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 11:41 am | |
| Jörn Hees | Nov 4, 2010 11:45 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 4, 2010 11:46 am | |
| Robert Fuller | Nov 4, 2010 11:48 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 4, 2010 11:58 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 12:00 pm | |
| Harry Halpin | Nov 4, 2010 12:03 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 12:07 pm | |
| Jörn Hees | Nov 4, 2010 12:10 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 12:12 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 12:12 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 12:14 pm | |
| Nathan | Nov 4, 2010 12:26 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 4, 2010 12:36 pm | |
| David Wood | Nov 4, 2010 12:56 pm | |
| Hugh Glaser | Nov 4, 2010 12:59 pm | |
| David Wood | Nov 4, 2010 1:14 pm | |
| Nathan | Nov 4, 2010 1:22 pm | |
| Bradley Allen | Nov 4, 2010 1:40 pm | |
| Mischa Tuffield | Nov 4, 2010 2:09 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 4, 2010 3:09 pm | |
| 92 later messages | ||
| Subject: | Re: Is 303 really necessary? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | William Waites (ww...@styx.org) | |
| Date: | Nov 4, 2010 8:43:51 am | |
| List: | org.w3.public-lod | |
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:22:09PM +0000, Ian Davis wrote:
Hi all,
The subject of this email is the title of a blog post I wrote last night questioning whether we actually need to continue with the 303 redirect approach for Linked Data. My suggestion is that replacing it with a 200 is in practice harmless and that nothing actually breaks on the web. Please take a moment to read it if you are interested.
cf. other discussion about RDF URI References and IRIs, where a resource is given an IRI that is not a valid URI as far as HTTP is concerned we can't dereference it properly so we need some kind of document -> description indirection... Though in general I think the best practice is only to give resources IRIs that are also valid URIs...
Cheers, -w





