atom feed9 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-ia64Re: Maxmem should be bytes ?
FromSent OnAttachments
Arun SharmaFeb 7, 2003 5:11 pm 
Arun SharmaFeb 13, 2003 4:17 pm 
Marcel MoolenaarFeb 13, 2003 4:23 pm 
Arun SharmaFeb 13, 2003 4:46 pm 
Marcel MoolenaarFeb 13, 2003 5:02 pm 
Arun SharmaFeb 14, 2003 5:35 pm 
Marcel MoolenaarFeb 14, 2003 6:16 pm 
Arun SharmaFeb 15, 2003 11:00 am 
Marcel MoolenaarFeb 15, 2003 12:58 pm 
Subject:Re: Maxmem should be bytes ?
From:Marcel Moolenaar (mar@xcllnt.net)
Date:Feb 14, 2003 6:16:20 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-ia64

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:36:01PM -0800, Arun Sharma wrote:

As for the fact that Maxmem is in bytes and physmem isn't: we define Maxmem to be equal to physmem (machdep.c:598). So they are in fact equal.

All I'm saying is:

--- machdep.c.old Fri Feb 14 17:32:26 2003 +++ machdep.c Fri Feb 14 17:33:22 2003 @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ } phys_avail[phys_avail_cnt] = 0;

- Maxmem = physmem; + Maxmem = ia64_ptob(physmem); init_param2(physmem);

i386 does something equivalent.

Your patch changes the granularity for Maxmem from pages to bytes. On all architectures it should be pages. On i386 you see atop(), which is the opposite of ia64_ptob().

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message